Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Russia launches criminal probes on prominent Kremlin critics

Russian authorities on Monday announced parallel criminal probes against a famous actor critical of the war in Ukraine and a philanthropist who supports the Russian opposition, the latest in a months-long, sweeping crackdown on dissent.

Russia’s Investigative Committee said in a statement that its chief Alexander Bastrykin ordered the launch of a criminal case against Artur Smolyaninov, a prominent Russian film and theater actor who left the country after Moscow’s forces invaded Ukraine and repeatedly spoke out against the war.

According to the statement, Smolyaninov “made a series of statements directed against Russia in an interview to a Western media outlet.” The Investigative Committee didn’t clarify which of Smolyaninov’s actions constituted a criminal offense and what charges it would bring against him.

Smolyaninov’s most recent interview last week sparked outrage among Kremlin supporters. The actor told the Novaya Gazeta Europe that if he had to fight in the war, he would fight “on the side of Ukraine.” “For me, it is on the side of my brothers who were attacked by my other brothers,” Smolyaninov said.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov on Monday welcomed a probe against Smolyaninov, noting that it is “important that our relevant (law enforcement) bodies think about these remarks.”

The probe against Smolyaninov comes amid increasingly harsh rhetoric about Russians who left the country because of the war. Lawmakers have suggested seizing the property of those who moved abroad, or increasing taxes for those continue to work remotely for Russian companies. Others have simply condemned them as “traitors.”

Separately, Russia’s Interior Ministry placed prominent philanthropist Boris Zimin on an international most wanted list on fraud charges, officials said Monday. Zimin has funded several Russian independent media outlets as well as projects of imprisoned opposition leader Alexei Navalny. He was reported to have left Russia in 2015.

Navalny, the Kremlin’s fiercest foe, said that it was Zimin who paid 79,000 euros for his medical evacuation to Berlin in August 2020, when the politician was poisoned with a nerve agent and lay in a coma in the Siberian city of Omsk.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Stocks extend gains on “soft landing“ hopes, China re-opening

2023-01-09T13:05:21Z

Investors sit in front of a board showing stock information at a brokerage house on the first day of trade in China since the Lunar New Year, in Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, China February 3, 2020. China Daily via REUTERS

European stock indexes rose in early trading on Monday and world stocks were at the highest in more than three weeks, boosted by investors scaling back expectations for U.S. Federal Reserve rate hikes and optimism about China’s borders reopening.

U.S. jobs data on Friday showed a jump in the workforce and easing wage growth. This, along with data pointing to a U.S. service sector contraction, was interpreted by investors as an indication that the Fed can be less hawkish. Global stocks rallied and the dollar dropped.

The upbeat market momentum continued on Monday, with Asian stocks up after China reopened its borders, bolstering the outlook for the global economy. MSCI’s broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan (.MIAPJ0000PUS) rose to its highest in more than six months.

At 1219 GMT the MSCI World Equity index was up 0.6%, having hit its highest since Dec. 15 (.MIWD00000PUS).

Europe’s STOXX 600 was 0.5% higher, also near a one-month high (.STOXX) but London’s FTSE 100 was down 0.1%, retreating after it hit its highest since 2019 earlier in the session (.FTSE).

Wall Street was set to open higher, with S&P 500 e-minis and Nasdaq 100 e-minis both up 0.4% , .

“The market is reading that wage pressures are easing quite rapidly and seeing that as positive and potentially people whispering the words ‘soft landing’ more loudly now,” said Hani Redha, global multi-asset portfolio manager at PineBridge.

A soft landing is the ideal Federal Reserve policy goal after raising interest rates, a situation in which inflation slows but there are not enough job losses to trigger a recession.

Redha said that there was “over-excitement” in the market reaction to the U.S. jobs data, and that more wage data would be needed.

Money markets were pricing in a 25% chance of a half-point hike in February, down from around 50% a month ago . Investors will look to Thursday’s CPI data for further clues as to the Fed’s next move.

The U.S. dollar index was down around 0.2%, still near its lowest in seven months after it dropped 1.2% on Friday .

The euro was up 0.4% at around $1.0688, versus a 1.2% jump on Friday .

China’s offshore yuan neared its highest in five months versus the U.S. dollar at 6.7882 , while the Australian dollar – often seen as a proxy for risk appetite – was up 0.6% on the day at $0.6913, having touched its highest since late August earlier in the session .

“The pace of (China’s) reopening is much more rapid I think than anyone was expecting and as a result we’ll see this flow through to the fundamentals for several months to come,” said PineBridge’s Redha. PineBridge said in November it had sharply raised its China equity exposure on expectations of China’s COVID rules easing.

“China’s going to be accelerating whereas you’ll see growth decelerating everywhere else, and that’s going to be fairly positive for Asia as a region and markets like Australia which are going to benefit from the impact on commodities as China reopens,” Redha added.

Oil prices climbed by more than 3%, as China’s reopening overshadowed concerns about a global recession.

Emerging market stocks (.MSCIEF) were up 2.4% on the day, and have risen by more than 20% since their October lows.

In bond markets, European government bond yields rose, in a reversal after the previous weeks’ sharp falls. Germany’s benchmark 10-year government bond was up 4 basis points at 2.252% .

The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield was up 2 bps at 3.5893 , also recovering after a sharp drop on Friday.

Earnings season kicks off this week with the major U.S. banks, with analysts fearing no year-on-year growth at all in overall earnings.

Categories
Selected Articles

MSN

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Biden border visit too late? El Paso city manager weighs in

(NewsNation) — President Joe Biden made his first trip as president to the southern border Sunday after two years in office.

Biden’s visit to one of the border towns at the center of the immigration debate comes as total migrant encounters have exceeded 718,000 in the last three months.

Is the trip too little, too late? El Paso City Manager Tommy Gonzalez says he would have liked for President Biden to visit when the border crisis was at its peak.

In the video above, Gonzalez explains what he thinks should be done to help with migrant crossings.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Pope condemns Iran“s use of death penalty against protesters

2023-01-09T11:47:06Z

Pope Francis talks to diplomats during the traditional exchange of the New Year greetings in the Regal Room at the Vatican January 8, 2018. REUTERS/Andrew Medichini/Pool

Pope Francis condemned Iran’s execution of protesters for the first time on Monday in his traditional New Year’s address to diplomats, and said the war in Ukraine was “a crime against God and humanity”.

The pontiff made his remarks in a speech to diplomats accredited to the Vatican, his overview at the start of the new year which has come to be known informally as his “state of the world” address.

His eight-page speech in Italian, read to representatives of most of the 183 countries accredited to the Vatican, ran the gamut of all the world’s conflict areas, including those in Africa, the Middle East and Asia.

He repeated his condemnation of abortion, appealing “particularly to those having political responsibilities, to strive to safeguard the rights of those who are weakest”, and he again warned of threat of a nuclear conflict.

However, the main novelty of the speech in the Vatican’s Hall of Benedictions was his breaking of silence on the nationwide unrest in Iran since the death last September of 22-year-old Kurdish Iranian woman Mahsa Amini in police custody.

“The right to life is also threatened in those places where the death penalty continues to be imposed, as is the case in these days in Iran, following the recent demonstrations demanding greater respect for the dignity of women,” he said.

Four protesters have been executed in connection with the wave of popular protests in the Islamic Republic.

“The death penalty cannot be employed for a purported state justice, since it does not constitute a deterrent nor render justice to victims, but only fuels the thirst for vengeance,” Francis said.

He then repeated an appeal for an end to capital punishment worldwide, saying it is “always inadmissible since it attacks the inviolability and the dignity of the person”.

Francis said many countries were paying lip service to commitments they had made to respect human rights and he called for respect for women, saying they were still widely being deemed second-glass citizens, subjected to violence and abuse.

“It is unacceptable that part of a people should be excluded from education, as is happening to Afghan women,” he said.

Francis spoke of the “war in Ukraine, with its wake of death and destruction, with its attacks on civil infrastructures that cause lives to be lost not only from gunfire and acts of violence, but also from hunger and freezing cold”.

He then immediately quoted from a Vatican constitution, saying “every act of war directed to the indiscriminate destruction of whole cities or vast areas with their inhabitants is a crime against God and humanity which merits firm and unequivocal condemnation”.

Referring to the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, he said: “Sadly, today too, the nuclear threat is raised, and the world once more feels fear and anguish.”

The pope repeated his appeal for a total ban on nuclear weapons, saying even their possession for reasons of deterrence is “immoral”.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

U.S. to give extra $100 million to Pakistan floods recovery

2023-01-09T11:27:35Z

A senior official from the U.S. development agency USAID said on Monday that Washington would provide an additional $100 million in funding for Pakistan’s recovery from devastating floods last year.

“I am delighted to announce that the United States is making an additional 100-million-dollar commitment to Pakistan to help it recover from the devastating 2022 monster monsoon floods,” USAID Deputy Administrator Isobel Coleman told reporters on the sidelines of a major conference in Geneva.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Facebook owner Meta removing content backing Brazil assault

2023-01-09T11:37:57Z

Facebook parent Meta (META.O) said on Monday it was removing content supporting or praising the weekend ransacking of Brazilian government buildings by anti-democratic demonstrators.

Tens of thousands of supporters of Brazil’s far-right former President Jair Bolsonaro smashed presidential palace windows, flooded parts of Congress with a sprinkler system and ransacked rooms in the Supreme Court in a more than three hour uprising.

“In advance of the election, we designated Brazil as a temporary high-risk location and have been removing content calling for people to take up arms or forcibly invade Congress, the Presidential palace and other federal buildings,” a Meta spokesman said.

“We are also designating this as a violating event, which means we will remove content that supports or praises these actions,” he said. “We are actively following the situation and will continue removing content that violates our policies.”

Leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva took office on Jan. 1 after defeating Bolsonaro in a runoff election in October, ending Brazil’s most right-wing government in decades.

Bolsonaro refused to concede defeat and some supporters have claimed the election was stolen, with people taking to social media and messaging platforms from Twitter (TWTR.MX), Telegram and TikTok to YouTube and Facebook, to organise protests.

Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes has ordered social media platforms to block users spreading anti-democratic propaganda.

Telegram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Sunday’s occupation of the government buildings had been planned for at least two weeks by Bolsonaro’s supporters in groups on social media messaging platforms such as Telegram and Twitter, yet there was no move by security forces to prevent what one group called “the seizure of power by the people”.

Messages seen by Reuters throughout the week showed members of such groups organising meeting points in several cities around the country, from where chartered buses would leave for Brasilia, with the intention to occupy public buildings.

During a demonstration by Trump supporters in January, 2021, social media companies were criticised for not doing enough.

Related Galleries:

Supporters of Brazil’s former President Jair Bolsonaro demonstrate against President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, in Brasilia, Brazil, January 8, 2023. REUTERS/Adriano Machado

A demonstrator reacts next to members of security forces as supporters of Brazil’s former President Jair Bolsonaro leave a camp outside the Army Headquarters, in Brasilia, Brazil, January 9, 2023. REUTERS/Amanda Perobelli
Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Brazil riot police deploy at Bolsonaro backers“ camp after capital stormed

2023-01-09T11:49:08Z

Aerial video showed supporters of Brazil’s far-right former President Jair Bolsonaro on Sunday (January 8) invading government buildings, in a grim echo of the U.S. Capitol invasion two years ago by fans of former US President Donald Trump.

Brazilian police deployed at a camp of supporters of far-right former President Jair Bolsonaro in the capital on Monday, a day after rioters launched the worst attack on Brazil’s state institutions since its return to democracy in the 1980s.

Hundreds of police in riot gear and some on horseback amassed at the encampment near Brasilia’s army headquarters, while soldiers in the area withdrew, Reuters witnesses said, after Sunday’s storming by thousands of Bolsonaro’s backers of Congress, the Supreme Court and the presidential palace.

President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Bolsonaro’s leftist rival who took office on Jan. 1 after a narrow October election win, promised to bring those responsible for the violence to justice, after demonstrators broke windows and furniture, destroyed art work and stole guns and artifacts.

U.S. President Joe Biden joined other world leaders in condemning the attacks, calling them “outrageous”, while Bolsonaro who is now in Florida denied inciting his supporters and said the rioters had “crossed the line”.

Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes ordered the governor of Brasilia removed from office late on Sunday for 90 days over alleged security failings. He also ordered social media platforms Facebook, Twitter and TikTok to block accounts of users spreading anti-democratic propaganda.

Facebook parent Meta (META.O) said on Monday it was removing content supporting or praising the weekend ransacking of Brazilian government buildings. Telegram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Lula, a former union organizer who was also president from 2003 to 2010, said the local militarized police force that reports to Brasilia Governor Ibaneis Rocha, a former Bolsonaro ally, did nothing to stop the protesters advancing.

Lula decreed federal intervention of public security in the capital and promised exemplary punishment for the leaders of the “fascist” assault that was aimed at provoking a military coup that could restore Bolsonaro to power.

“All the people who did this will be found and punished,” Lula told reporters from Sao Paulo State.

He blamed Bolsonaro for inflaming his supporters after a campaign of baseless allegations about election fraud after the end of his rule marked by divisive nationalist populism.

From Florida, where Bolsonaro flew 48 hours before his term ended, the former president rejected the accusation. He said on Twitter that peaceful demonstrations were democratic but the invasion of government buildings “crossed the line.”

The assault raised questions among Lula’s allies about how security forces in the capital were so unprepared and easily overwhelmed by rioters who had discussed plans on social media for days about gathering for weekend demonstrations.

The invasion recalled the assault on the U.S. Capitol two years ago by backers of former President Donald Trump, drawing condemnation from Biden, European leaders, Latin American heads of state and others.

“The violent attacks on democratic institutions are an attack on democracy that cannot be tolerated,” German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said on Monday. British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak condemned any bid to undermine the peaceful transfer of power.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Russia condemned “in the strongest terms” the actions of those behind the disorder.

Brazilian markets are expected to take a knock when they open on Monday.

Police retook the damaged public buildings in the futuristic capital after three hours and dispersed the crowd with tear gas.

Justice Minister Flavio Dino said 200 demonstrators had been arrested. Governor Rocha, writing on Twitter before the court announced its move, put the number at 400.

Dino said investigations would aim to uncover who financed the several hundred buses that brought Bolsonaro’s supporters to Brasilia and also probe Rocha for not preparing security.

The occupation of the government buildings had been planned for at least two weeks by Bolsonaro’s supporters in groups on social media messaging platforms such as Telegram and Twitter, yet there was no move by security forces to prevent the attack, called by one group “the seizure of power by the people.”

Messages seen by Reuters throughout the week showed members of such groups organizing meeting points in several cities around the country, from where chartered buses would leave for Brasilia, with the intention to occupy public buildings.

The plan included camping in front of Brasilia’s army command headquarters, where demonstrators have been since Lula narrowly won the election in October.

In the early afternoon of Sunday, when the protesters began to arrive on Brasilia’s esplanade, instead of being contained, they were escorted by Military Police cars with flashing lights.

Riot police only arrived on the scene two hours after the invasions began.

Bolsonaro faces legal risks from several investigations before the Supreme Court in Brazil and his future in the United States, where he traveled on a visa issued only to sitting presidents, is in question.

“Bolsonaro should not be in Florida,” Democratic Congressman Joaquin Castro said on CNN. “The United States should not be a refuge for this authoritarian who has inspired domestic terrorism in Brazil. He should be sent back to Brazil.”

Related Galleries:

Supporters of Brazil’s far-right former President Jair Bolsonaro who dispute the election of leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva gather near Brazil’s Congress after protesters had invaded the building as well as the presidential palace and Supreme Court, in Brasilia, Brazil January 8, 2023. REUTERS/Antonio Cascio

Supporters of Brazil’s far-right former President Jair Bolsonaro who dispute the election of leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva gather at Planalto Palace after invading the building as well as the Congress and Supreme Court, in Brasilia, Brazil January 8, 2023. REUTERS/Antonio Cascio

Police cars are pictured amidst tear gas after being pushed off the road by supporter of Brazil’s far-right former President Jair Bolsonaro who dispute the election of leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, during protests, in Brasilia, Brazil January 8, 2023. REUTERS/Antonio Cascio

Supporters of Brazil’s far-right former President Jair Bolsonaro who dispute the election of leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva gather outside Brazil’s Congress after protesters had invaded the building as well as the presidential palace and Supreme Court, in Brasilia, Brazil January 8, 2023. REUTERS/Antonio Cascio

Police block supporters of Brazil’s far-right former President Jair Bolsonaro who dispute the election of leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva outside Brazil’s Congress after protesters had invaded the building as well as the presidential palace and Supreme Court, in Brasilia, Brazil January 8, 2023. REUTERS/Antonio Cascio


Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Year 2023: Scenarios for Ukraine

It is psychologically difficult, sitting at a personal computer several hundred kilometers from the front, to assess the activities when your comrades are defending Ukraine with weapons in their arms, when Russian aggressors pummel the peaceful properties of Ukrainians, and we pay back for our freedom and independence with the blood of our citizens.

Thoughts run higher, but let’s test to evaluate the problem as impartially as doable. What fundamental situations await Ukraine in 2023?

The key dilemma for the huge the vast majority of Ukrainians is uncomplicated: Will Ukraine gain the war in 2023?

Currently, four theoretically attainable choices for the enhancement of events are rising.

Alternative 1: Ukraine will gain the Russo-Ukrainian War and restore its territorial integrity within the internationally acknowledged borders of 1991.

This is the publicly declared formal aim of Ukraine in the Russo-Ukrainian war. Its very achievement would be perceived by the majority of Ukrainians as a victory.

Even now, a considerable proportion of our fellow citizens recognize victory as nothing at all fewer than the crushing defeat of Russia and its disintegration into different principalities. Such an opinion can make a whole lot of sense, considering that Russia is an existential danger to Ukraine as an impartial sovereign nation, and Ukrainians as an unbiased political nation.

The version of “victory within just the borders of 1991” is the most desirable for our Western partners, specifically from “old Europe,” which remains in thrall to their pro-Russian illusions.

Selection 2. None of the parties – neither Ukraine nor Russia will be equipped to acquire a decisive gain, the entrance will stabilize in the positions of autumn 2022.

Less than such a scenario, the war will step by step move into the phase of a fifty percent-frozen conflict, identical to the problem in the east of Ukraine from 2016-2021. At the exact same time, the “freezing” of military operations is unlikely to be extended-long lasting. The conditional “split” will be made use of by the get-togethers – Ukraine and the aggressor place – to pump up their army muscle tissue.

The war will resume following some time with a new harmful pressure and will take location till the remaining victory of one of the sides.

Possibility 3. Russia is defeated in the war and ceases to exist as a sovereign region.

This solution is most likely the most desirable for Ukrainians, looking at the quantity of suffering Russian troops have brought to the territory of Ukraine.

Hence, the threat to Ukraine from its belligerent northern neighbor seems to have been last but not least eradicated. At the same time, in such a circumstance, we will need to constantly take into account revanchist attitudes that will be cultivated “behind the fence.”

Choice 4. Ukraine is defeated in the war and ceases to exist as a sovereign condition.

It is hard to publish about this kind of a variant, but we are unable to reject it.

It is unlikely that the earlier mentioned choices for the progress of occasions will be applied in a “pure” sort. There will usually be some nuances.

I should emphasize as soon as all over again that all the possible choices listed previously mentioned are theoretical but the likelihood of their implementation sometimes differs by an purchase of magnitude.

Exterior help from the U.S. and its allies is one of the vital elements in Ukraine’s victory

We will not analyze the very last two alternatives, which require a crushing defeat of either Ukraine or Russia, in this posting. Their functional manifestation would be inextricably linked with a radical adjust in the international policy of the U.S. and its allies, and the likelihood of this kind of adjustments is close to zero.

That is, a devastating defeat of Russia is doable only if the whole armed forces prospective of the U.S. and its allies is activated and a direct army conflict between NATO and Russia ensues. This is barely probable, because beneath such a scenario the threat of a world-wide thermonuclear conflict gets critically superior.

On the contrary, a crushing defeat for Ukraine turns into additional possible only if all military services-complex and monetary support from the U.S., U.K. and EU is stopped. This appears to be like very unlikely now.

At the similar time, a vital lower in Western assist may guide to the impossibility of conducting offensive functions of our Armed Forces.

Other aspects influencing hostilities

But we ought to not around-inflate the relevance of the foreign assist factor – since it is mostly many thanks to the significant overcome ability of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and their good offensive functions that we can have this discussion at all.

Other variables will impact the system of military services functions. In certain, the achievable “war fatigue of Western society,” which is already becoming cultivated by the Russian-controlled mass media and their brokers of impact in the West, the intra-celebration struggle in the U.S. involving the Trumpists and the Democrats, the depletion of warehouse stocks of modern day weapons, and the impossibility of its creation in a short time.

Overestimated expectations can play in opposition to Ukraine, when any short term failure will be perceived as a catastrophe and accompanied by scapegoating, interior political wrestle and underestimation of the enemy.

Russia, thanks to the earlier merciless exploitation of its natural resources, even now retains a ample reserve of economic power. In addition, the “zombified” Russian modern society, in spite of several human losses, proceeds to help the Putin regime and its aggressive war versus Ukraine.

Another factor that surely influences the system of the predicament is the existence of nuclear weapons in Russia. And it’s not just about the “nuclear bluff” that comes from the mouth of former President Dmitri Medvedev.

The point is that no planet politician, general public figure or analyst right now has an respond to to the dilemma of irrespective of whether the Russian dictator Vladimir Putin will use nuclear weapons when his defeat in the war is inevitable, when he is pushed into a lifeless stop of physical survival, or when he faces the genuine prospect of a prison trial for war crimes.

And will the Russian elite, the officers liable for the simple use of nuclear weapons, and his personalized stability, make it possible for him to choose this ridiculous action?

What awaits us in 2023?

The actual condition is still considerably from this kind of pessimistic forecasts. The take a look at of Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to the U.S. witnessed a qualitative modify in the supply of fashionable weapons to Ukraine.

Despite the fact that fragile, as a outcome of the posture of the Trumpist minority, actual bipartisan help for Ukraine has been secured, as evidenced in an write-up by influential Republicans, former U.S. Secretary of Point out Condoleezza Rice and former Defense Minister Robert Gates.

The U.S. has introduced the provision of another tranche of army help well worth a report $3.75 billion and is not going to prevent there. In the close to long term, we be expecting the supply of extra advanced weapons, which until eventually a short while ago had been not regarded feasible at all – in individual, two Patriot air protection batteries (and not only from the U.S., but also from Germany), American Bradley battling autos and their German Marder and French AMX-10RC counterparts.

The most possible choice in 2023 is the restoration of the territorial integrity of Ukraine within just the internationally identified borders of 1991, or at the very least a related improvement on the front strains that will make victory inescapable in the near potential.

 Ihor Zhdanov is a co-founder of the Open Policy Foundation, a non-government organization (NGO) in Ukraine.

The sights expressed are the author’s and not automatically these of Kyiv Publish.

Supply hyperlink

The post Year 2023: Scenarios for Ukraine appeared first on Ukraine Intelligence.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Biden is throwing migrants under the bus to appease Republican fearmongering | Moustafa Bayoumi

The Biden administration criticizes conservatives as anti-immigrant – yet pursues policies not so different from Trump’s

Imagine for a moment that you are a dissident citizen of Nicaragua. Forced out of bed in the middle of the night and hounded out of your homeland because of your political activities, you have been deprived of all chances to work, let alone live, in the country you’ve always called home. Your opposition to President Daniel Ortega’s regime has put your life and your family’s lives in danger. You must find safety immediately.

You know that, despite its long history of meddling in your country, the United States also has laws and traditions that enable people in your position to seek asylum. It may be far away, but the US is also the closest country where you believe you can truly feel safe. You must find a way there – any way at all – and it has to be quick.

Moustafa Bayoumi is the author of the award-winning books How Does It Feel to Be a Problem?: Being Young and Arab in America and This Muslim American Life: Dispatches from the War on Terror. He is professor of English at Brooklyn College, City University of New York

Continue reading…