Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

EXPLAINED: Russia’s ‘Even Tougher Assaults’ on the Town of Soledar

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has claimed his troops had been withstanding “new and even more durable assaults” on the city of Soledar, which has been turned into a wasteland strewn with the bodies of lifeless Russian troops.

 “Thanks to the resilience of our soldiers there, in Soledar, we won supplemental time and (preserved) forces for Ukraine,” Zelensky extra.

 But the combating has also taken a large toll on Ukrainian forces and army officers have acknowledged that Russian fighters have created gains in some parts.

 In which is Soledar?

 Soledar is a salt-mining city situated in the Donetsk location, close to 15 kilometers (9 miles) from Bakhmut.

 Ahead of the war it had a populace of 70,000 but is now the epicenter of the whole war.

 Who controls the city?

 Ukrainian protection officials have stressed that Russian forces do not thoroughly command the city but admit they have innovative in specified places.

 Footage posted on social media on Monday displays Russian troops in the vicinity of the administration making in the middle of the town.

 Earlier on Monday, Russian-backed separatist forces in the Donetsk region stated they captured the village of Bakhmutske, just a couple of kilometers absent from Soledar.

 How fierce is the preventing?

 Previously on Monday, the Ukrainian Armed Forces (AFU) said they repelled an endeavor to seize Soledar, but that combating had immediately resumed.

 Zelensky claimed “the entire land in Soledar is coated with corpses of the invaders,” including: “Everything is entirely ruined.”

 In a put up on Telegram, Deputy Defense Minister Ganna Malyar, explained Russian troops in the newest attacks were “literally stepping on the corpses of their possess troopers employing massed artillery, MLRS systems and mortars”.

 There has been no formal term on Ukrainian losses for the duration of the defense of the town.

 What has Russia reported about the assaults?

 Russia’s defense ministry did not remark on Monday on the combating in Soledar and technically, it’s not basically the Russian army that the Ukraine is battling there.

 Bakhmut and Soledar are the prized ambitions of Yevgeny Prigozhin, founder of the Wagner mercenary team, who has explained the preventing is staying carried out “solely” by the group’s units.

 Malyar on Monday appeared to affirm this, stating: “Presently, the enemy has deployed a substantial amount of assault models fashioned from the ideal reserves of the Wagner Team.”

 Why is Prigozhin so obsessed with Soledar?

 Prigozhin himself has claimed that he wishes to seize Bakhmut and Soledar simply because of the strategic option presented by the cavernous salt mines underneath the area which, pre-war, have been made use of to host concert events and sporting occasions.

 “The cherry on the cake is the program of Soledar and Bakhmut mines, which is basically a community of underground towns,” he claimed on Telegram on Saturday.

 “It not only [has the ability to hold] a major team of people today at a depth of 80-100 meters, but tanks and infantry fighting vehicles can also shift about.”

 Prigozhin also claimed the caves maintain huge stockpiles of weapons from Entire world War I but this has been disputed.

 Is he telling the fact?

 Which is up for discussion, and the military advantage of keeping the mines is questionable.

 U.S. officers imagine he’s simply motivated by the potential economic profit of using handle of the mines which would be in line with Wagner’s modus operandi in other conflicts it has participated in.

 The Institute for the Study of War also notes that some Russian milibloggers have questioned the wisdom of losing so quite a few guys in an attritional struggle with Ukraine, indicating that even getting Soledar and Bakhmut would be a strategic defeat in the context of so many losses.

 U.S. officers claimed very last week that out of a pressure of almost 50,000 mercenaries, Wagner has sustained about 4,100 killed and 10,000 wounded in Ukraine. More than 1,000 of all those killed died concerning late November and early December in close proximity to Bakhmut.

Source hyperlink

The post EXPLAINED: Russia’s ‘Even Tougher Assaults’ on the Town of Soledar appeared first on Ukraine Intelligence.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

HBO’s The Last of Us Adaptation Is Astonishingly Well Made—But Something’s Missing

In a vignette that opens the second episode of HBO’s post-apocalyptic epic The Last of Us, a professor of mycology is eating lunch in a Jakarta restaurant when two military types whisk her away mid-bite. Transported to a government lab, she inspects the corpse of a factory worker whose body is now host to a writhing, bloodthirsty fungus. When she learns that the source of the human bite that caused the dead woman’s infection remains unknown, the scientist starts to shake; the teacup in her hand rattles against its saucer. One officer begs her to help them make a medicine or a vaccine. But she knows that a cure would be impossible. Saving humanity, says the genteel academic, will require mass murder: “Bomb this city and everyone in it.”

[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

It’s one of many chilling moments in a series, premiering Jan. 15, whose predominant moods are tense, mournful, and unnerving. And while almost all of the action in The Last of Us takes place halfway around the world from Indonesia, in the United States, the professor’s lethal prescription sets the tone for a story whose characters are constantly forced to choose between protecting themselves and their loved ones, and making existential sacrifices for the good of a plague-ravaged society. Based on the acclaimed video game franchise and created by the game’s mastermind, Neil Druckmann, and Chernobyl creator Craig Mazin, the show is by turns gorgeous and harrowing, brutal and warm. From the performances to the storytelling to the aesthetic elements, it’s an exquisitely made adaptation. But it also asks viewers to absorb a whole lot of human misery without saying much that we haven’t already heard in similar shows.

The plot is a pastiche of familiar post-apocalyptic survival narratives, though not one that too closely resembles any particular predecessor. In the show’s alternate-reality 2003, climate change catalyzes a mutation in the terrifying Cordyceps fungus that allows it to take over the human body, essentially transforming its victims into deadly zombies. Within a week of its discovery in Indonesia, the brain-colonizing affliction spreads around the globe, causing chaos, violence, the collapse of society, and the demise of the vast majority of the human race. You know the drill: one minute the frequency of ambulance sirens is a cause for mild concern; the next, people are fighting mushroom monsters who used to be their next-door neighbors.


Liane Hentscher—HBOPedro Pascal in The Last of Us

Although we meet one of two protagonists, a contractor and single father named Joel (Pedro Pascal), just before the plague decimates his home state of Texas, most of the show takes place two decades later. Joel has made his way to Boston, where he and his partner Tess (Anna Torv) work as smugglers—a dangerous job in a ruined, walled-off city controlled by a fascist government, FEDRA, that condemns even the pettiest of criminals to public execution. Apolitical survivors by nature, the couple is gearing up for a risky trek to Wyoming, in search of Joel’s idealistic brother, Tommy (Gabriel Luna), when they become entangled in the machinations of a righteous, militant rebel faction, the Fireflies. The group’s leader, Marlene (Merle Dandridge), cuts a deal with them to escort a young woman who could hold the key to humanity’s future.

Fourteen-year-old Ellie (Game of Thrones breakout Bella Ramsey) is a headstrong, independent orphan with a remarkable secret: she is, as far as anyone can tell, the only person who’s been bitten by a zombie without being infected. If she can make it to a laboratory out west, where Firefly scientists are conducting crucial research, she might be able to help develop the cure that seemed impossible 20 years earlier. But the journey won’t be easy; networks of corpse-powered fungi still lie in wait for fresh blood, and the humans who’ve lived through the past few decades are a pretty cutthroat bunch. Further complicating things is Ellie’s delicate relationship with Joel, who’s grown hardened and gruff since losing a daughter her age in 2003.

As they travel west together, following a trajectory that supposedly hews quite closely to that of the game, Druckmann and Mazin carve out space to tell the stories of the people our heroes encounter. There’s an idyllic gated commune and a Christian cult on the verge of starvation. The closer these digressions get to individual characters, the less generic they feel. In Kansas City, a grieving community leader (Melanie Lynskey) launches a scorched-earth quest to destroy a man (Lamar Johnson) who betrayed her in an effort to save his own leukemia-stricken son (Keivonn Woodard). A bittersweet vignette that comprises most of the season’s best episode casts Nick Offerman as a misanthropic survivalist who builds a relatively luxurious fortress around himself and then accidentally booby-traps the perfect person (Murray Bartlett) to share it with him.


Liane Hentscher—HBOBella Ramsey and Pedro Pascal in The Last of Us

Smartly cast and evocatively written, these side stories effectively evoke an emotional response. (Criers, be warned.) Even the surrogate parent-child bond that inevitably develops between Joel and Ellie transcends cliché thanks to the performances. Liberated from his Mandalorian mask, Pascal tempers Joel’s stoicism with glimpses of tenderness; you can see his protective-dad muscle memory kicking in despite his insistence that he sees Ellie as mere cargo. Alternately plucky, goofy, heartbreakingly naive and, necessarily, mature beyond her years, Ramsey’s sensitive portrayal of her orphaned character might be the show’s greatest asset.

Equally impressive is the visual world Druckmann and Mazin import from the game. Created in consultation with concept artists at the Last of Us’ developer, Naughty Dog—and financed with a massive budget that reportedly topped $100 million for the eight-episode debut season—the series’ backdrops vary widely but share a distinctive patina of post-apocalyptic decay. Each infected body has its own freakish, human-mushroom hybrid features, and the patterns that the fungus makes as it creeps across walls and floors and furniture are at once beguiling and nauseating. Now that so much of what we see on the big and small screens has a vaguely unreal aspect imparted by the overuse of computerized effects, it’s a particular pleasure to see a video-game adaptation that’s genuinely cinematic, immersing us in the majesty of snow-covered mountains at one moment and the grimy details of an abandoned shopping mall the next.

The Last of Us is so skillfully, meticulously, and lovingly constructed—to call it TV’s best video-game adaptation would be to damn it with faint praise—that it was tempting to ignore the question that nagged at me throughout each episode: What’s the point? It’s not that the characters’ motivations are muddled, or that the central dilemma of self vs. society isn’t explored in enough depth. But that moral conflict, which resonated with so many fans of the game, isn’t exactly novel in this medium. There have been so many post-apocalyptic dramas in recent years: The Walking Dead franchise, Sweet Tooth, The Rain, Snowpiercer, The 100, Y: The Last Man. Just about all of them touch on similar themes. The very best examples, like HBO’s own The Leftovers and HBO Max’s Station Eleven, don’t just ask whether the ends of one person’s survival justify the means; they conjure unique visions of spirituality, art, and love influenced by the ordeal of living through the end of the world. Each can be wrenching at times, but both leave viewers with profound ideas about what it means to be a person in precarious times.

I don’t know that The Last of Us has comparable insight to offer. Having never played the game, I can only imagine that the meaning-shaped hole in its otherwise robust story is something players fill with their own simulated but still, in a sense, firsthand experiences of embodying Joel and Ellie. A game that interrogates your ethics is a game that teaches you about yourself. In the form of beautifully rendered, often devastating TV, the effect is less illuminating and more masochistic. What’s the point of putting yourself through so much vicarious suffering, at a time when everyday life offers plenty of the real thing, if you’re not going to come out the other side any wiser?

Categories
Selected Articles

Zelensky talks with leaders of several European countries about increasing defense support

c2FT1lqkox52.png

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

EXPLAINED: Russia’s ‘Even Tougher Assaults’ on the Town of Soledar

17f6724fb3dc4b66bffe9362f7aa622c.jpg?w=1

A Ukrainian official said Russian fighters ‘literally step on the corpses of their own soldiers’.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Kremlin Planning to Mobilize 500,000 Servicemen – Intel General

c0fe770d8e61c11774801f5f4309697b.jpg?w=1

Russia intends to mobilize 500,000 more troops in January in addition to the 300,000 drafted in October. The mobilization is expected to be announced on Jan. 15.

Categories
Selected Articles

Newspaper headlines: ‘No way back’ says Harry and hope of strike breakthrough

The unnamed source says the King, Queen Consort and Prince William fear anything they say to Harry will now be made public – adding that they won’t engage as they “don’t recognise the version of events” set out in his memoir and recent interviews.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Putin’s Lonely Christmas Amid His Hopeless War jamestown.org/program/putins…

Putin’s Lonely Christmas Amid His Hopeless War jamestown.org/program/putins…
Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Prince Harry interviews set to raise heat on UK royal family bklynguide.com/entertainment-…

Prince Harry interviews set to raise heat on UK royal family bklynguide.com/entertainment-…
Categories
Selected Articles

Ukraine War Has Revealed Russia is no Superpower

Putin’s war was designed to showcase the return of Russia as an imperial power – but it has done the exact opposite.

Wars are both accelerators and revealers. The Austro-Prussian war of 1867 speeded up Austria’s loss of great power status and revealed Prussia as the leading German state. The Franco-Prussian war of 1871 revealed that France was no longer Europe’s No 1 power – and that Germany was. World War I fast-forwarded the collapse of European dynasties and empires, the emancipation of women and the arrival of communism – and so it goes on.

The war in Ukraine has also speeded up and revealed things. It has turbo-charged the creation of a homogenised Ukrainian nation with a fixed Western, anti-Russian identity. It has also revealed a thing hitherto only half guessed-at: that for all Vladimir Putin’s imperial posturing, Russia is not remotely the superpower that the USSR once was, or even a serious rival to the US.

It has also revealed the continuing overwhelming strength of the US as well as the continuing relevance of NATO.


A protester holds a banner reading ‘Russia is a terrorist state’ during a protest organized by the Russian Democratic Society in Serbia in Belgrade, Serbia, 24 December 2022. Russian troops entered Ukraine on 24 February 2022 starting a conflict that has provoked destruction and a humanitarian crisis. EPA-EFE/ANDREJ CUKIC

Scroll back a year and today’s status quo was almost unthinkable. In February 2022, it was a given that, if push came to shove, the Russian steamroller would knock down the gates of Kyiv in days and shift Russia’s de facto frontier several hundred miles westwards. Hardly anyone predicted the blunders and botched manoeuvres that failed to deliver Odessa or Kharkhiv to Russia, let alone Kyiv.

Russia has also failed totally bring the West to its knees and break its unity by blackmailing it over energy – another wrong call. We are already in January, the spring thaw is weeks away, and no Western country froze to death this winter, even if most are reeling from higher energy costs and inflation. In card game terms, the Russian ace turned out to be the two of clubs. It’s also a card that Russia cannot play twice. Germany has practically weaned itself off Russian energy. The only lasting result of the energy stand-off is that Putin has to sell his most precious resource at bargain rates to his supposed ally China.

Putin is increasingly in the same position as the Serbian dictator Slobodan Milosevic was in his final years – desperately trying to repackage epic failures as great successes.

After Milosevic catastrophically lost his all-or-nothing gamble in Kosovo – to “solve” the problem of the Kosovo Albanians by getting rid of them – he doubled down on the loss of Kosovo as a victory; yes, it turned out he had saved Serbia from a land invasion by NATO! In fact, no invasion of Serbia had even been on the table, and Serbs saw through the ruse.

Putin is using similar language today, claiming the invasion of Ukraine was not, after all, about conquering/liberating Ukraine but about saving Russia from being broken up by the West.


A man walks past a billboard depicting Russian President Vladimir Putin with a note written in Serbian language ‘Happy birthday to President Vladimir Putin from Serbian brothers’, signed by Conservative movement ‘Nasi’ in Belgrade, Serbia, 07 October 2022. Orthodox Patriarch Kirill asked all to pray for the health of the longest serving leader of Russia since Josef Stalin, as Russian President Putin turned 70 on 07 October 2022. EPA-EFE/ANDREJ CUKIC

Putin’s minion, Dmitry Medvedev, spelled this out in a speech before New Year. “The Anglo-Saxon perverts”, he said, had been foiled in their plan “to shred us into pieces”. Except there never was a plan to break up or “shred” Russia. Contain, yes, shred, no. Only China would gain from the breakup of Russia, and the last thing the West wants is fragments of Russia dropping into China’s orbit.

Of course, the tide could yet turn in the spring, the next Russian offensive could be more successful than its predecessors, Zelensky could exhaust the US with his endless demands and pressure could grow on Kyiv to cut its losses and agree a weak peace.

But there is no immediate sign of any of that happening. And so far, if this is a “proxy war” between the US and Russia, it’s a proxy war going America’s way. US investment in Ukraine, unlike past investments in Afghanistan, or South Vietnam, has paid off. The US is barely sweating over the cost of the Ukraine war, for all the Republican complaints.

“While US aid to Ukraine has scarcely been cheap, US spending has been at token levels compared to the economic burden that the cost of the Ukraine war and economic sanctions have placed on Russia,” a recent commentary by Anthony Cordesman of the think tank the Center for Strategic and International Studies wrote.

This reminded us that US GDP is 13 times that of Russia and US defence spending is also 13 times higher than Russia’s. In other words, unless it loses heart, the US can hardly fail to outgun and exhaust Russia.

The US is not losing any of its own fighters in Ukraine, either – no embarrassing body bags coming home; Russia, meanwhile, has lost a lot of men, 100,000, according to Western estimates.

Why should the US back off at this stage? To save Putin’s face? A Russian triumph in Ukraine would have encouraged aggressive adventures by China, whereas a weakened Russia will be a deterrent to China, likely delaying a dreaded face-off over Taiwan.

The Balkans, too, could reap a peace dividend from the humbling of Russia’s ambitions. Had Putin stormed into Kyiv, Serbia might have been more tempted to try its hand in restive northern Kosovo, its very own Donbass. Now the pro-Russians in Serbia – and elsewhere in the region – may have to rethink their options.

Marcus Tanner is an editor of Balkan Insight and the author of “Albania’s Mountain Queen, Edith Durham and the Balkans” [Tauris].

The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of BIRN.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

The Golden Globes return Tuesday in a 1-year audition

After going dark for a year, the Golden Globes return to the air Tuesday on a one-year audition to try to win back their awards-season perch and relevancy to a Hollywood that shunned the awards after an ethics and diversity scandal.

Stars and studios boycotted last year’s ceremony, which NBC opted not to televise, saying the Hollywood Foreign Press Association needed time to make “meaningful reform.” A year later, much — though not all — of Hollywood appears ready to party, again.

Following red carpet coverage (E! will air it live beginning at 6 p.m. EDT), the broadcast from the Beverly Hilton in Beverly Hills, Calif., starts at 8 p.m. on NBC. For the first time, the show will also be live-streamed, on NBCUniversal’s Peacock. When the Globes were on the brink, NBC reworked its deal with the HFPA, putting the awards on a one-year contract and moving the show to Tuesday from its regular Sunday night spot.

Hosting is comedian Jerrod Carmichael, who won an Emmy last year for his HBO special “Rothaniel.” Eddie Murphy and Ryan Murphy are set to receive tributes. Presenters include Ana de Armas (a nominee for “Blonde”), Jenna Ortega (nominated for “Wednesday”), Billy Porter, Tracy Morgan, Jennifer Coolidge (nominated for “White Lotus”) and Quentin Tarantino. Sean Penn will also introduce a message from Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

UNTANGLING THE GLOBES’ MESS

The Globes were plunged into chaos shortly before a largely remote pandemic 2021 awards show when a Los Angeles Times report revealed that the HFPA, then numbering 87 members, had no Black members. A separate New York Times report showed that the group — an often ridiculed collection of little-known foreign journalists based in Los Angeles — paid its members some $3 million in annual salaries, and detailed a litany of ethical lapses in how the organization regularly interacted with potential nominees.

Under mounting pressure, the HFPA pledged to reform, diversified its membership and changed some of the ways it operates. It now has 96 members, including six Black members, along with 103 nonmember voters. Billionaire Todd Boehly purchased the Globes through his Eldridge Industries, and has begun turning the nonprofit group into a for-profit company.

IS ANYONE STILL BOYCOTTING?

Reaction to the Globe nominations last month was muted, with few stars publicly celebrating. But only one nominee has stated emphatically that he will not attend: Brendan Fraser. Though nominated for best actor for his performance in “The Whale,” Fraser said he would not participate in the Globes. In 2018, Fraser said he was groped in 2003 by longtime Hollywood Foreign Press Association member Philip Berk. Berk, who is no longer an HFPA member, denied it.

Eyes will be especially trained Tuesday on Tom Cruise, whose “Top Gun: Maverick” is nominated for best picture, drama. Cruise responded more forcefully to the HFPA revelations than almost anyone in the industry, returning his three Golden Globe awards.

But all studios are again participating in the Globes. As it has for most award shows, viewership to the Globes telecast has cratered. After the 2020 awards were watched by 18.4 million, the 2021 edition managed just 6.9 million, according to Nielsen. Still, the Globes remain a valuable marketing tool for awards contenders, propping up ads for films in the long stretch between the holidays and the Oscars, which air arch 12. Some of this season’s top contenders, including Steven Spielberg’s “The Fabelmans” and Todd Fields’ “Tár,” have struggled attract large audiences.

THE NOMINEES

Martin McDonagh’s feuding friends tale “The Banshees of Inisherin” comes in with a leading eight nominations, including nods for actors Colin Farrell, Brendan Gleeson, Kerry Condon and Barry Keoghan. Daniel Kwan and Daniel Scheinert’s existential action comedy “Everything Everywhere all at Once” is up for six awards, including nods for Michelle Yeoh, Ke Huy Quan and Jamie Lee Curtis.

Several of the past year’s biggest box-office hits are also in the mix. Along with “Top Gun: Maverick,” “Tár” and “The Fabelmans,” the nominees for best picture, drama include James Cameron “Avatar: The Way of Water” and Baz Luhrmann’s “Elvis.”

On the TV side, the public school sitcom “Abbott Elementary” leads with five nominations, including a nod for Quinta Brunson’s lead performance. “The White Lotus,” “Dahmer,” “The Crown,” “Pam & Tommy” and “Only Murders in the Building” all scored four nominations each.

Nominees include: Brad Pitt (“Babylon”), Viola Davis (“The Woman King”), Daniel Craig (“Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery”), Angela Bassett (“Black Panther: Wakanda Forever”), Julia Roberts (“Gaslit”), Donald Glover (“Atlanta”), Bill Hader (“Barry”), Selena Gomez (“Only Murders in the Building”), Kevin Costner (“Yellowstone”), Diego Luna (“Andor”) and Bob Odenkirk (“Better Call Saul”).