Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

What to Know About the Retirement Age Protests in France

On Thursday in Paris, trains were at a standstill. Schools were empty. The Eiffel Tower was closed to visitors.

But at the Place de Republique, over 80,000 protesters filled the streets holding signs with messages like “don’t touch my retirement!”

The “Black Thursday” strikes were organized by several prominent trade unions in France in opposition to President Emmanuel Macron’s plan to overhaul the pension program. Railways, schools, and refineries were amongst the industries that saw workers walk out in protest, calling the decision a “historic regression.”

[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

Pushing the Retirement Age

Macron introduced his plan to overhaul the pension system last week, which included a measure to raise the minimum retirement age from 62 to 64. The proposal is nothing novel—Macron first proposed changing the pension system back when he was elected in 2017, as France’s retirement age is among the lowest in the world.

As populations age and birth rates decline across the world, many countries have been forced to raise their retirement ages to meet the growing number of those seeking pension. Spain’s minimum retirement age is 65, and the U.K’s is 67, with an increase to 68 planned in 2044. Germany’s retirement age is currently 67, but the country is considering raising their retirement age to 70 as they face a dip in pension funds.

“In France, those who are currently working pay into the fund that those in retirement are paid from,” explains Andreas Bieler, a Professor of Political Economy at University of Nottingham who focuses on labor movements. ”Because there is a change in population [and] there are more older people in retirement and fewer younger workers who actually pay, there are concerns about sustainability.”


Kiran Ridley—Getty ImagesA passenger boards a suburban train at Gare de l’Est Railway Station in Paris as France is hit by widespread traffic disruption with limited services running as transport workers join a nationwide strike on Jan. 19.

Then and now, changes to the program were not met warmly. In 2019, when the government presented a points-based system that would allow a person to retire once they had gained a certain number of points, thousands of protesters took the streets across France in what was one of the longest demonstrations in France’s history. The government was forced to drop the measures amid the coronavirus pandemic.

The new plan is more straightforward, increasing funds by making the French work longer. A recent public opinion poll found that over 60% of French people oppose the plans, which has united France’s left and far-right groups in their opposition.

The planned reforms would yield an additional 17.7 billion euros ($19.1 billion) in annual pension contributions, allowing the system to break even by 2027, according to Labour Ministry estimates. The unions have called for other ways to increase funds, like taxing the ultra-rich or increasing employer payroll contributions, Reuters reported.

“When there’s a strike, they better focus on what the citizens taking action have to say,” said Phillippe Martinez, the Secretary General of the CNT trade union. “It’s rare in France to see all the trade unions agreeing on something, so it demonstrates the seriousness of the problem to those leading the country.”

Widespread Strikes

The protests drew out a million people and extended across major French cities, including Marseille, Toulouse, Nantes and Nice and come as a cost of living crisis continues to squeeze out workers worldwide.


Bart Biesemans—ReutersA general view of Place de la Republique as protesters attend a day of national strike and protests in Paris, Jan. 19.

Last year, workers across France demonstrated to protest rising inflation and demand salary increases. The U.K. has seen a number of strikes across the NHS, rail services, and universities, with the country’s rail minister, Huw Merriman, confirming that the government lost more money due to the impact of rail strikes than it would have cost to settle the disputes months ago.

With the war in Ukraine continuing to impact energy prices and inflation on the rise worldwide, Bieler says that these movements are more likely to pick up steam. “All of this is happening against the background of a cost of living crisis,” says Bieler. “We have increasing levels of inflation, we haven’t seen since the 70s and of course, we’ve just come out of a pandemic which has already put downward pressure on wages and people’s income and savings.”

“Workers are being squeezed.” says Bieler, who notes that wage increases are not matching the ballooning inflation. “A lot of people are in really emergency situations.”

What Comes Next?

Macron plans to proceed with the changes despite protests. AP reported that, during a news conference at a French-Spanish summit in Barcelona, Spain, Macron said that “we must do that reform” to “save” the pension system.

“We will do it with respect, in a spirit of dialogue but also determination and responsibility,” he added. The change is expected to be debated in Parliament next month, where Macron no longer has an absolute majority.

Bieler notes that protests haven’t always been enough to move the needle against pension reforms in the past. Millions took the street in protest when Conservative president Nicolas Sarkozy moved the retirement age to 62 from 60 in 2010, but the action did not prevent the reform from going through.

“In the end, I think there always have to be compromises and some reform is going to take place,” says Bieler.

But the French unions aren’t backing down yet, calling for another strike on Jan. 31st.

“The government must give up,” the unions said in a statement, according to Bloomberg News. “This reform is unacceptable and goes against the interests of the population. Workers want to retire in good health.”

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

New Netflix co-CEO Greg Peters is set for a big raise with more than $30 million in potential stock options and bonuses — on top of a $3 million salary

Greg Peters, COO of Netflix.Greg Peters, now co-CEO of Netflix, is set for a major payday, with an annual salary of $3 million.

Netflix

  • Netflix COO Greg Peters is stepping to a new role as co-CEO.
  • As co-CEO Peters will receive an annual salary of $3 million, according to an SEC report.
  • Peters could also receive more than $17 million in stock options and a $14 million bonus.

The tides have changed for Greg Peters, who stepped into a new role as co-CEO of Netflix on Thursday. Until now, Peters has served COO of the streaming giant, where he helmed Netflix’s push into ads and gaming

According to a filing with the SEC, Peters will be raking in an annual salary of $3 million. Added to that, he’ll get an annual stock option allocation totaling more $17 million and is also on track to receive an estimated bonus of more than $14 million. 

Meanwhile, his predecessor as co-CEO, company co-founder Reed Hastings — who held at least a piece of the top job for the past 25 years— will be taking a hefty pay cut. 

Hastings will now serve as executive chairman, earning just $500,000. Added to that, Hastings will receive $2.5 million in stock options, the report notes. Hastings’ bonus was not disclosed. 

Amidst a tough economic climate, where layoffs abound, executive compensation has been a topic of discussion, and concern, at many major tech companies. Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, is voluntarily took a 40% pay cut and will bring in just $49 million this year

Netflix did not immediately respond to Insider’s request for a comment. 

 

Read the original article on Business Insider
Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

The US is scrambling to find what experts say may be the ‘most important’ hardware Ukraine needs to hold off Russia in 2023

Ukraine Luhansk artillery L119 howitzerUkrainian troops prepare to fire an L119 howitzer at Russian positions in the Luhansk region on January 16.

ANATOLII STEPANOV/AFP via Getty Images

  • Ukraine and Russia have relied heavily on artillery to batter each other’s forces.
  • Whether they can find more ammunition for that artillery will affect the course of the war in 2023.
  • To support Ukraine, the US and its allies are searching all over the world for the right shells.

Amid indications that Russia is planning to resume offensive operations in spring 2023, Ukraine’s allies are scrambling to provide Ukraine with sufficient artillery ammunition.

But this requires scouring the globe for munitions to feed Ukraine’s polyglot collection of Soviet-designed guns and the dizzying array of howitzers and rocket launchers supplied by various Western countries.

“Ammunition availability might be the single most important factor that determines the course of the war in 2023, and that will depend on foreign stockpiles and production,” US defense experts Michael Kofman and Rob Lee wrote in December for the Foreign Policy Research Institute.

The US has vowed to ramp its munitions production. The US Army recently began searching for companies that can help assemble XM1128 155 mm extended-range howitzer ammunition.

Ukraine artillery soldiers troops BakhmutA Ukrainian artillery unit fires at Russian positions near Bakhmut in December.

SAMEER AL-DOUMY/AFP via Getty Images

This month, the Army is conducting an Industry Day to “inform the industrial base of the potential U.S. Army requirements to accelerate the production and delivery of 155-mm Projectiles and ancillary equipment and the need to expand the industrial base capability.” This includes not just the shell itself but all necessary components such as propellant, fuses, and packing materials.

Even the US’s non-European allies are being asked to contribute. The US is buying 100,000 155 mm shells from South Korea that will be sent to Ukraine.

The problem is that expanding production lines for munitions may take years, a process not helped by Pentagon bureaucracy. The challenges are even harder for Europe, with a large but fragmented arms industry spread across many nations. Years after post-Cold War defense cutbacks, Europe is striving to supply Ukraine despite limited stockpiles and production capability.

The US has also pledged to provide Ukraine with “non-standard ammunition,” which means shells for Ukraine’s Russian-designed guns that use a design and caliber not produced by US factories. Ukraine’s shopping list includes 152 mm and 122 mm howitzers, 122 mm rockets, and ammunition for tank cannons. This has resulted in US officials buying munitions from Eastern European factories equipped to produce Russian-style munitions.

Cyclist bike Kupiansk UkraineThe town of Kupiansk near Kharkiv, seen here on January 6, has experienced regular Russian shelling.

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

The US has had to do this before in order to support clients such as Iraq and Afghanistan, which used Soviet- and Russian-made weapons. But the high-intensity combat in Ukraine is generating far higher demand than those smaller conflicts.

Artillery — Stalin’s famous “god of war” — has been the backbone of both the Russian and Ukrainian armies. Russia has relied on massive saturation barrages to support its sluggish infantry and armor, while Ukraine has scored tremendous successes using precision-guided shells and rockets such as the HIMARS multiple rocket launcher.

But the god of war has a voracious appetite: In November, the Pentagon estimated that Russia was firing 20,000 shells a day, while Ukraine fired 4,000 to 7,000.

There is a good reason Ukraine has targeted Russian ammunition depots with GPS-guided HIMARS rockets. Russia may already be experiencing a shell shortage so bad that Moscow is buying munitions from North Korea. Ukrainian forces have reported that Russian barrages are now less intense.

Ukraine artillery soldiers troops BakhmutUkrainian artillery troops handle rounds while firing on Russian positions near Bakhmut in December.

SAMEER AL-DOUMY/AFP via Getty Images

In World War I and II, artillery ammunition wouldn’t have been such a problem. The US, Germany, Britain, and Russia eventually developed enough manufacturing capacity to keep their big guns in action. During the Soviet offensive against the Seelow Heights in April 1945, Red Army gunners fired 500,000 shells in 30 minutes.

But things changed after the Cold War. For two decades, the US focused on supporting small-scale counterinsurgency operations rather than the ammo-guzzling “big war” being waged in Ukraine. European armies and defense industries withered, while the post-Soviet military suffered under extensive budget cuts.

Meanwhile, defense procurement increasingly shifted to buying small numbers of expensive, high-tech guided shells and rockets.

But the Russo-Ukraine war has demonstrated the continued need for large quantities of shells. The god of war is still a big eater.

Michael Peck is a defense writer whose work has appeared in Forbes, Defense News, Foreign Policy magazine, and other publications. He holds a master’s in political science. Follow him on Twitter and LinkedIn.

Read the original article on Business Insider
Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

White House aides were reportedly blindsided by AG Garland’s appointment of a special counsel to investigate Biden

Joe BidenPresident Joe Biden.

JIM WATSON/POOL/AFP via Getty Images

  • Many in the White House were blindsided when AG Garland appointed a special counsel to investigate Biden, WaPo reported.
  • The move marked a big setback for Biden’s legal team as it tried to avoid the public firestorm that Trump faced.
  • The GOP has accused the special counsel Robert Hur of being partisan, but a former Trump lawyer disagreed, saying he’s “smart and experienced.”

After President Joe Biden’s legal team discovered a cache of classified documents last year at his old office at a Washington, DC, think tank, they immediately contacted the White House counsel’s office, which then notified the National Archives.

Biden’s attorneys were determined to abide strictly by the rulebook to avoid the political firestorm that encircled Biden’s predecessor, Donald Trump, after the FBI executed a search warrant at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate last August.

That’s why many in the White House were blindsided, according to The Washington Post, when Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed a special counsel to investigate Biden’s mishandling of classified information.

The appointment of Robert Hur — a Trump-era US attorney in Maryland — put Garland and the Justice Department in the unprecedented position of overseeing parallel special counsel investigations into the current and former presidents. While Hur handles the Biden inquiry, special counsel Jack Smith, a veteran former war crimes prosecutor, is overseeing the DOJ’s investigation into Trump’s handling of classified documents.

The revelation of the Biden documents probe and Hur’s subsequent appointment as special counsel were a significant setback for the president’s legal team, The Post reported, and scuttled any plans they had to avoid the level of public scrutiny that Trump did after the FBI search.

Republicans and Democrats alike have criticized the Biden White House for failing to disclose the existence of the DOJ’s investigation for two months, despite having known about it since November.

Trump and his stalwart GOP allies have also accused the Justice Department of employing a double standard and treating Trump more unfairly than Biden. But legal scholars caution against conflating the two inquiries, noting that Biden’s team immediately notified the archives and has been cooperating with the DOJ, while Trump refused to turn over troves of sensitive government records over 18 months of back-and-forth with US officials.

Trump’s failure to comply with a grand jury subpoena for the documents and subsequent efforts to retain them was what prompted the FBI to execute a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago. After Trump announced the search on Truth Social, Garland took the unusual step of publicly confirming it, saying that it’s not standard protocol for the department to reveal such information, but that he felt compelled to do so after Trump announced it.

In the Biden probe, Garland tapped Hur as special counsel after NBC News reported that the president’s aides had discovered a second batch of classified records at another, undisclosed location after undertaking an “exhaustive” search.

Republicans have since pounced on Hur as a partisan player who would treat Biden with leniency. They’ve pointed, in particular, to Hur’s time working as a deputy to the former top DOJ official Rod Rosenstein, who was instrumental in the department’s investigation into the Trump 2016 campaign’s ties to the Russian government.

But Ty Cobb, who once served as Trump’s White House counsel, dismissed those concerns.

Cobb used to work with Hur at the Justice Department and also interacted with him during the Mueller probe, when he was Trump’s counsel and Hur was Rosenstein’s deputy. Hur “isn’t as aggressive as some” but “is smart and experienced,” Cobb said.

“Staffing will be telling, of course,” he said, adding that when Hur was the US attorney in Baltimore he “did a good job. Certainly has the intellect and experience.”

Read the original article on Business Insider
Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Brazilian drag artist says GOP Rep. George Santos ‘couldn’t cut it’ as a drag queen: ‘He is crazy’

George SantosU.S. Rep. George Santos (R-NY).

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

  • A Brazilian drag performer said Thursday that GOP Rep. George Santos “couldn’t cut it” as a drag queen.
  • The performer, Eula Rochard, also told Insider on Thursday that Santos “is crazy.” 
  • Santos has denied having performed as a drag queen.

A Brazilian drag performer who says she was once friends with GOP Rep. George Santos told NBC News that the newly-elected congressman “couldn’t cut it” as a drag queen. The performer, who uses the drag name Eula Rochard, also spoke with Insider via Instagram on Thursday. 

Santos had an “outgrown sense of grandeur” and “lied all the time,” Rochard told NBC, adding Santos “never the type of drag queen who could hold down the show.”

The New York congressman has denied that he ever performed in drag.

“The most recent obsession from the media claiming that I am a drag Queen or ‘performed’ as a drag Queen is categorically false,” Santos said in a tweet from his official account. “The media continues to make outrageous claims about my life while I am working to deliver results. I will not be distracted nor fazed by this.”

Insider asked Rochard for a response to Santos’ denial. “He is crazy,” Rochard said in Portuguese.

Santos’ denial came after Rochard and another acquaintance told Reuters that he competed as a drag queen in Brazilian beauty pageants over a decade ago.

Rochard told the outlet that she first became friends with Santos in 2005, when he was cross-dressing at the first gay pride parade in a suburb of Rio de Janeiro. She added that Santos competed as a drag queen at a 2008 beauty pageant in Rio.

The other acquaintance asked Reuters not to be named but said they also knew Santos from Brazil and that he participated in drag queen pageants and wanted to be Miss Gay Rio de Janeiro.

Santos was consumed by scandal before even arriving in Washington. He lied on his resume, falsely claimed his mom died on 9/11, and has been cagey about how his sudden unexplained wealth helped finance his congressional run. Multiple Republicans, including top officials in New York, have called on him to resign. Santos has rejected those calls.

Speaker Kevin McCarthy has also been unwilling to push Santos out, meaning the New Yorker is unlikely to be forced to sashay away from Washington anytime soon.

Read the original article on Business Insider
Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Netflix added more Q4 subscribers than expected ahead of a shakeup in its executive ranks

wednesdayJenna Ortega in “Wednesday,” which was a hit for Netflix in Q4.

Netflix

  • Netflix added more than 7 million subscribers in the fourth quarter, significantly more than expected.
  • The strong growth comes as Reed Hastings announced he is stepping down as co-CEO.
  • Greg Peters, the company’s former COO who led its push into advertising, will take over the role. 

Netflix added 7.66 million subscribers in last year’s fourth quarter, significantly more than the 4.5 million additions the company had projected three months ago. 

The stronger-than-anticipated subscriber growth comes as the company announced a shakeup in its top ranks: Netflix’s co-founder Reed Hastings has stepped down as co-CEO. The company’s former COO, Greg Peters, has stepped into the co-CEO role, joining Ted Sarandos, who has been co-CEO since 2020. Hastings will stay on as executive chairman.

Netflix said it is “increasingly focused on revenue as our primary top-line metric” in its Q3 report, but revenue for the fourth quarter was $7.85 billion, in line with expectations but the lowest since the company went public, according to Reuters.

Shares of Netflix wer up more than 6% in recent after-hours trading.

Following this report, Netflix will no longer provide subscriber forecasts but will continue to provide revenue guidance.

In his role as COO, Peters led the company’s expansion into advertising as the company sought new revenue drivers. In November, Netflix launched its cheaper ad-supported plan, something it had previously pushed back against doing. Netflix Basic with Ads costs $6.99 per month in the US.

The company noted in the Q3 report that it didn’t expect a “material contribution” in Q4 from the new ad plan and that it expected to grow the membership for the plan “gradually over time.”

Even so, reports indicated that Netflix Basic with Ads was off to a slow start. The Wall Street Journal reported last month that it was Netflix’s least popular plan in November, citing data from the analytics firm Antenna.

Content-wise, Netflix had a strong quarter to end the year, releasing one of its biggest TV shows in “Wednesday” and one of its most popular movies with “Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery.”

But 2022 brought with it unique challenges. It lost subscribers in the first two quarters of the year, marking the first time the company lost members for two quarters in a row. It cut at least 500 roles in sweeping layoffs

The company rebounded in Q3 by adding subscribers, and executives appeared to take a victory lap during that earnings call in October by defending the company’s strategies.

Read the original article on Business Insider
Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

U.S. announces $2.5 billion in additional military assistance for Ukraine

2023-01-19T23:21:36Z

U.S. Bradley fighting vehicles that will be deployed in Latvia for NATO’s Operation Atlantic Resolve wait for an unload in Garkalne, Latvia February 8, 2017. REUTERS/Ints Kalnins/File Photo

The United States on Thursday announced a new package of military assistance for Ukraine it valued at up to $2.5 billion, including hundreds of armored vehicles and support for Ukraine’s air defense.

The latest assistance includes 59 Bradley Fighting Vehicles and 90 Stryker Armored Personnel Carriers, the U.S. Defense Department said in a statement.

The latest assistance also includes additional ammunition for High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS), eight Avenger air defense systems, tens of thousands of artillery rounds and about 2,000 anti-armor rockets, the Defense Department said.

In total, the United States has committed more than $27.4 billion in security assistance to Ukraine since Russia invaded in February last year.

Western allies have pledged billions of dollars in weapons for Ukraine. Fearing winter will give Russian forces time to regroup and unleash a major attack, Ukraine is pushing for more assistance to combat Moscow’s invasion.

In his trip to Washington in December, President Volodymyr Zelenskiy told the U.S. Congress that assistance to Ukraine is an investment in democracy, and not charity, while pressing for continued American support.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Singer-songwriter David Crosby dead at age 81, Variety reports

2023-01-19T23:23:02Z

David Crosby, one of the most influential rock singers of the 1960s and ’70s with the Byrds and Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young (CSNY) has died at the age of 81, Variety reported on Thursday, citing a statement from Crosby’s wife.

“It is with great sadness after a long illness, that our beloved David (Croz) Crosby has passed away” Variety quoted his wife, Jan Dance, as saying in the statement.

Crosby’s UK-based representatives could not immediately be reached for comment by Reuters.

Crosby was a founding member of two revered rock bands: the country and folk influenced Byrds, for whom he cowrote the hit “Eight Miles High,” and CSNY, who defined the smooth side of the Woodstock generation’s music. He was inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame as a member of both groups.

Musically, Crosby stood out for his intricate vocal harmonies, unorthodox open tunings on guitar and incisive songwriting. His work with both the Byrds and CSN/CSNY blended rock and folk in new ways and their music became a part of the soundtrack for the hippie era.

Personally, Crosby was the embodiment of the credo “sex, drugs and rock ‘n’ roll,” and a 2014 Rolling Stone magazine article tagged him “rock’s unlikeliest survivor.”

In addition to drug addictions that ultimately led to a transplant to replace a liver worn out by decades of excess, his tumultuous life included a serious motorcycle accident, the death of a girlfriend, and battles against hepatitis C and diabetes.

“I’m concerned that the time I’ve got here is so short, and I’m pissed at myself, deeply, for the 10 years — at least — of time that I wasted just getting smashed,” Crosby told the Los Angeles Times in July 2019. “I’m ashamed of that.”

He fell “as low as a human being can go,” Crosby told the Times.

He also managed to alienate many of his famous former bandmates for which he often expressed remorse in recent years.

His drug habits and often abrasive personality contributed to the demise of CSNY and the members eventually quit speaking to each other. In the 2019 documentary “David Crosby: Remember My Name,” he made clear he hoped they could work together again but conceded the others “really dislike me, strongly.”

Crosby fathered six children – two as a sperm donor to rocker Melissa Etheridge’s partner and another who was placed for adoption at birth and did not meet Crosby until he was in his 30s. That son, James Raymond, would eventually become his musical collaborator.

Looking back at the turbulent 1960s and his life, Crosby told Time magazine in 2006: “We were right about civil rights; we were right about human rights; we were right about peace being better than war … But I think we didn’t know our butt from a hole in the ground about drugs and that bit us pretty hard.”

Crosby was born on Aug. 14, 1941, in Los Angeles. His father was a cinematographer who won a Golden Globe for “High Noon” in 1952 and his mother exposed him to the folk group the Weavers and to classical music.

Related Galleries:

62nd Grammy Awards – Arrivals – Los Angeles, California, U.S., January 26, 2020 – David Crosby. REUTERS/Mike Blake

Musician David Crosby performs during a benefit concert to help defeat Proposition 32 on the State of California?s November election ballot at Nokia theatre in Los Angeles, California, U.S. October 3, 2012. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni

Musician David Crosby poses for a portrait before an interview regarding his new autobiography, in New York, U.S. November 28, 2006. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

Neil Young, Graham Nash, David Crosby, and Stephen Stills of the band Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young pose at a press conference in New York, U.S. October 12, 1999. REUTERS/Peter Morgan

Singer David Crosby (L) and wife Jan Dance pose at the 2014 MusiCares Person of the Year gala honoring Carole King in Los Angeles, U.S. January 24, 2014. REUTERS/Danny Moloshok

Singer David Crosby performs at the “September 11th Children’s Benefit Concert” sponsored by U.S. Congressman Marty Meehan’s (D-Ma) “Meehan Educational Foundation,” at the Paul Tsongas Arena in Lowell, Massachusetts, U.S. December 5, 2001. REUTERS/Jim Bourg/


Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

Why a Possible Drag Queen Past Won’t Loosen the GOP Grip of George Santos

This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME’s politics newsletter. Sign up here to get stories like this sent to your inbox.

There comes a point in every relationship where enough is enough. For the current Republican Party, you might think the prospect that one of their own was a former drag queen who played a role in the death of a dog would be that moment. And yet, it would seem there is no end in sight for Republican leaders and their ongoing—and highly tortured—defense of Rep. George Santos, an apparently fabulist freshman whose C.V. reads more fictitious by the day. After all, Santos may be a problem child, but he’s a useful vote to keep the GOP in power.

[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

The latest pestering came via reporting that Santos, who campaigned as a hard-right conservative, performed in drag during his time in Brazil in the late aughts. Santos, who identifies as a gay man and supported Florida’s Don’t Say Gay law, has disputed the report—one of the few instances of specific denial in a growing litany of contradictions and fabrications that have come to light since he won an upset race on Long Island in November. GOP leaders apparently knew that his résumé was as fishy as the seafood counter in Bayville, but nonetheless allowed his candidacy to move ahead—for a second time—as they chased power.

And now, with just a five-vote House majority and essentially zero defections to spare, most Republicans are wrapping themselves in Santos’ contradictions, tall tales, and personas—including Kitara Ravache, the apparent stage name he used as he chased the title of Miss Gay Rio. Hypocrisy, it seems, only matters if it comes with cost, and is merely an annoyance if the offending party keeps its spoils, no matter how spoiled.

The latest stench around Santos—who previously called himself Anthony Devolder—comes in direct contradiction to his party’s harsh rhetoric on LGBTQ rights, including drag performers. For some conservatives, drag performers invite perversion and challenge sex characteristics—and a useful foil to rile up potential voters who perceive the acts as alien to their values. For many Americans, events like Drag Queen Story Hour, which began in San Francisco in 2015, were initially a way to get children reading and using their imaginations. Now that’s the case so long as the protesters who interrupt them don’t frighten the kids with their threats of violence.

Still, for GOP leadership, Santos (née Kitara Ravache) is a useful widget in their majority machine. After all, he is the first openly gay Republican to win a seat in Congress as a non-incumbent, and the district is New York’s richest, meaning the right Republican in that role could help raise bank for the party. Santos even won seats on the committees overseeing small business and science, suggesting Republican indifference to charges that they are talking out of both sides of their mouths on LGBTQ policies just to keep a seat in a district that leans in Democrats’ favor. (To be fair, a few New York Republicans have called on Santos to find the door, and find it fast.)

Then again, this really ought not be surprising. At this point, Santos has been caught misrepresenting himself on all manner of things. His schooling, his faith, his wealth, his mother’s whereabouts on 9/11, his grandmother’s experiences during the Holocaust, his staffers’ deaths at a gay club in Orlando… All subject to his creative interpretations, it seems. Just Wednesday, as Reuters was publishing its dispatch on Miss Kitara’s dreams of a tiara, Patch.com broke the story that a charity linked to Santos raised $3,000 to help a disabled veteran save his dog’s life, only to stiff the man. (Again, Santos has denied the reporting, and it may not even matter.)

In almost any other environment, Republicans would have said enough is enough—and not because of the LGBTQ component necessarily, given D.C.’s rich history of gay men wielding great power, as James Kirchick documents in his captivating history of the topic published last year. The seemingly daily revelations about Santos are an enormous distraction, as he can barely move through the Capitol complex without a phalanx of reporters asking him about the drumbeat of drama around who, exactly, he is. No other lawmaker draws such a mix of Hill veterans, tabloid-like interest, and plain is this really happening? gawking, the kind that is rarely seen at the Capitol.

At some point, most lawmakers in such a bind realize they can’t do the job under such conditions. Democratic Rep. Anthony Weiner quit in 2011 after a three-week circus surrounding his lewd online messages, Republican Rep. Trey Radel of Florida called it a day in 2014 after pleading guilty to misdemeanor cocaine possession, Republican Rep. Tim Murphy in 2017 announced his resignation in the wake of reports he pressured his lover to have an abortion… The list is not a short one. But in each case, the member made the calculated decision that sometimes survival at any cost just isn’t worth the headaches.

Absent that self-awareness, Congress itself can remove troublesome colleagues with a two-thirds vote. To be clear, it’s happened only twice since the Civil War’s end, and both men were deeply problematic. It’s safe to bet Santos knows this, which along with his useful vote for the Republican agenda is why he is staying put. At least for now, his comrades in the House find Santos useful and haven’t yet reached their breaking point. As long as Santos protects the slim Republican majority, he has some degree of protection—even if his experience is one more appropriate for the New Fiction or True Crime sections of Amazon than anything passing a civics textbook.

Make sense of what matters in Washington. Sign up for the D.C. Brief newsletter.

Categories
Audio Sources - Full Text Articles

CIA director visits Kyiv, meets with Ukraine’s Zelenskyy

WASHINGTON (AP) — CIA Director William Burns visited Kyiv last week to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, a U.S. official said Thursday, in the latest example of high-level contacts between the U.S. and Ukraine.

The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the director’s classified schedule, declined to disclose what Burns and Zelenskyy discussed. Burns also met with Ukrainian intelligence officials. The CIA director has briefed Zelenskyy repeatedly before and since Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine last February, passing on U.S. intelligence findings about Moscow’s war plans and intentions.

The war launched by Russian President Vladimir Putin is soon to enter its second year having resulted in tens of thousands of deaths and with no clear resolution on the horizon. Washington is about to send another $2.5 billion in aid to Ukraine, including for the first time Stryker armored vehicles.

Burns’ meeting with Zelenskyy was first reported by The Washington Post.

The CIA director told PBS NewsHour last month that agency analysts predicted “a reduced tempo and fighting between the two militaries as winter sets in.”

“I don’t underestimate for a moment the burdens, the challenges, that this war poses for Ukrainians first and foremost, but for all of us who support Ukraine,” said Burns, a former U.S. ambassador to Moscow. “But strategically, I think, in many ways, you know, Putin’s war has thus far been a failure for Russia.”