Pay $5 to Palmer Report:
![]()
Pay $25 to Palmer Report:
![]()
Pay $75 to Palmer Report:
![]()
Help support Palmer Report! Our articles are all 100% free to read, with no forced subscriptions and nothing hidden behind paywalls. If you value our content, you’re welcome to pay for it:
Pay $5 to Palmer Report:
![]()
Pay $25 to Palmer Report:
![]()
Pay $75 to Palmer Report:
![]()
Sign up for the Palmer Report Mailing List.
In an opinion piece published in the Chicago Tribune on June 19, 2014, Donald Trump vehemently defended the use of a huge sign bearing his name on the Trump International Hotel & Tower in Chicago. He argued against critics who believed such a sign was architecturally and aesthetically offensive, claiming āmy name is known and respected worldwideā and ābrings a prominence to Chicago by mere fact of recognition.ā
There is no question that Trumpās name is known worldwide, but Trump excels in offering new reasons for his name to become even less respected with each passing day. It has reached a point where now, eight years later, the Chicago Tribuneās editorial board is demanding that itās time āto take a jackhammerā to the vain eyesore that persists as a monument to hate, fascism, and corruption.
The Tribuneās new editorial on Thursday offers a quick history lesson of how Trumpās sign came to be, which is a tale replete with strategic political contributions and shady dealings. The Tribune then acknowledges its own recent support for Trumpās sign. Just last year, the newspaper came out against a proposed ordinance that would ban anyone āconvicted of treason, sedition or subversive actions from doing business with the city, including having a sign permit.ā
In doing so, the Tribune declared in 2021: āItās Trumpās building, and he should have the prerogative of stamping his name on it.ā Concerned about āanti-Trump feverā that could lead the city to attract a lawsuit alleging violations of private property rights, the Tribune insisted at the time that city officials āwould be wise to swallow their distaste and leave the sign alone.ā
However, two very recent developments have changed the equation, prompting the Tribune to pen a new editorial proposing that the toxic sign be demolished. The first is Trump calling for the āterminationā of the Constitution on account of a āmassive fraudā that stole the 2020 election from him, as the man-child claimed. The second is a jury finding that the Trump Organization āwas corrupt at the coreā and an obvious ācriminal enterprise.ā
The Tribune now calls for Chicago to figure out a way to jackhammer that sign to the groundāwhether itās new negotiations, another ordinance, or a public relations campaign. Not only does the Tribune support such an effort this time, but it suspects āmost everyone who lives thereā would as well. Indeed, itās high time for this oversized sign promoting an equally overinflated ego to go.
Pay $5 to Palmer Report:
![]()
Pay $25 to Palmer Report:
![]()
Pay $75 to Palmer Report:
![]()
Write for the Palmer Report Community Section.
Pay $5 to Palmer Report:
![]()
Pay $25 to Palmer Report:
![]()
Pay $75 to Palmer Report:
![]()
The post Another Trump hotel falls under a cloud of controversy appeared first on Palmer Report.
