Categories
Selected Articles

In Arrest Of Former Top FBI Agent, Shadow Of Russian Oligarch Deripaska Looms — Again

08530000-0a00-0242-d7a7-08dafd8d7494_cx0

On November 21, 2021, FBI agents acting on a court-ordered search warrant seized the personal electronic devices — cell phones, computers, tablets, and similar items — of a former Russian diplomat and a retired FBI agent.

The seizure went unnoticed publicly. No details were announced, either by the U.S. Justice Department or by the two men themselves: where, when, who, why.

Eight days later, a new filing appeared in the Justice Department’s Foreign Agent database, where people and companies who represent foreign principals are legally required to disclose their clients and activities. The filing was by Sergei Shestakov, a former Russian diplomat who later worked a translator for the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office.

The filing indicated that a top official from the company belonging to Russian tycoon Oleg Deripaska had sought “professional assistance” from Shestakov. The official, identified as Yevgeny Fokin, communicated periodically with Shestakov, and Shestakov said he sought the help of Charles McGonigal — “a security professional.”

Less than a month later, Shestakov submitted an updated filing, saying he was ending his registration for work on behalf of Fokin.

Fast-forward exactly 14 months: McGonigal and Shestakov were arrested by FBI agents on January 21 and charged with money laundering, making false statements, and helping Deripaska evade U.S. financial sanctions imposed on him in 2018.

The case has stunned people in U.S. intelligence and law enforcement for multiple reasons. The main reason: Until 2018, McGonigal — a 22-year veteran of the FBI — was the bureau’s top agent in charge of counterintelligence, supervising and participating in investigations of Russian spies and moles in the United States — not to mention oligarchs.

That includes Deripaska.

“It definitely shocked me, and here I thought I was unflappable,” said Miriam Baer, a former assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York, the powerful Manhattan federal prosecutors’ office that brought the charges against McGonigal — and that McGonigal likely worked with in the past.

Oleg Deripaska attends an event in Moscow in September 2020.


Oleg Deripaska attends an event in Moscow in September 2020.

The troubling questions now, Baer says, are not only why McGonigal allegedly committed criminal acts, but whether he acted alone, whether others were aware, and why no one in a premier FBI office picked up on what was going on.

“If this was a true ‘rogue’ agent, then perhaps there is no worry of overlap with” cases overseen by the Southern District, said Baer, now a professor of law at Brooklyn Law School. “If his behavior implicates a broader conspiracy that involves other FBI personnel, then I would think overlap more likely and therefore a greater concern.”

The case also turns the spotlight back on Deripaska, a billionaire businessman with close ties to the Kremlin who has been on the radar of U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies, not to mention political circles, for at least two decades.

“The ability of [Deripaska] to penetrate powerful legal circles and now law enforcement circles is quite amazing,” said Louise Shelley, an academic who studies corruption and transnational crime at George Mason University and who appeared on a panel discussion with McGonigal in 2020.

“It is a case of enablers on steroids,” she told RFE/RL.

McGonigal, who was arrested as he arrived at New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport on January 21, was released on bail after entering a not-guilty plea during his first court appearance. His next appearance is scheduled for March.

“As you all know, Charlie’s had a long, distinguished career with the FBI,” his defense lawyer, Seth DuCharme, told reporters outside the courthouse. “He served the United States for decades. This is obviously a distressing day for Mr. McGonigal and his family.”

‘A Broad, Multimillion-Dollar Political Influence Campaign’

The charges McGonigal faces stem from two indictments: one was filed by Washington, D.C., federal prosecutors and addresses work that they say McGonigal did on behalf of Albanian interests, including not disclosing an “ongoing relationship with the prime minister of Albania.”

The second, filed in New York, concerns Deripaska, who has been dogged for years by reports of connections to suspected organized-crime groups, including to Semyon Mogilevich, a Russian-Ukrainian businessman formerly on the FBI’s Top Ten Most Wanted List.

Deripaska did not respond to an e-mail sent via his holding company EN+. A spokeswoman, meanwhile, told The New York Times that Deripaska did not hire McGonigal for any purpose and also that Deripaska had never been close to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Many Russia experts, and U.S. officials, have long concluded that oligarchs like Deripaska are able to retain their fortunes so long as they stay on the good side of Putin and the Kremlin. U.S. State Department officials say Deripaska has particularly close personal relations with Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.

Beginning in 2006, the State Department denied Deripaska a visa, citing concerns about ties to organized crime. The difficulties led him to enlist the lobbying influence of former Republican Senate leader Bob Dole and, later, the work of an influential Washington lobbying firm run by a former chairman of the Republican Party.

Deripaska also developed a business relationship with another Republican political operative who had worked for Dole: Paul Manafort. Manafort tried to resolve Deripaska’s visa problems in the 2000s, but the two had a falling out after a failed business venture.

Later, Manafort served as campaign manager for Donald Trump’s presidential campaign in 2016, until revelations about his work for pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine led to his firing. He also allegedly passed secret campaign information to a Russian-Ukrainian man named Konstantin Kilimnik, who worked for Deripaska and who was described by the Senate Intelligence Committee as “a Russian intelligence officer.”

Deripaska managed to travel the United States more than a half-dozen times between 2011 and 2014 using a Russian diplomatic passport, a U.S. State Department official told RFE/RL. That was later backed up by court documents filed in another U.S. lawsuit involving Deripaska.

In 2009, Deripaska reportedly traveled to the United States under a secret arrangement with the FBI.

Manafort was later prosecuted and convicted by a federal jury on money-laundering and bank-fraud charges in 2018. He was pardoned by Trump in December 2020, just weeks before the end of Trump’s presidency.

A 2020 report released by the Senate Intelligence Committee highlighted Manafort’s dealings saying between 2004 and 2009, “Manafort implemented these influence operations on behalf of Deripaska, including a broad, multimillion-dollar political influence campaign directed at numerous countries of interest to Deripaska and the Russian government.”

Between 2014 and 2016, Deripaska was targeted by U.S. law enforcement for another reason. According to The New York Times, Justice Department officials tried unsuccessfully to enlist him as an informant, to glean insight into Russian organized crime and Kremlin thinking.

In April 2018, Deripaska and his aluminum company were hit with sanctions.

In October 2021, the FBI raided two homes owned by Deripaska or related legal entities, in New York and Washington, D.C. Deripaska vented about the raids and what he called “the transcendental stupidity…of the American establishment.”

FBI officers are seen outside the home of Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska in Washington in October 2021.


FBI officers are seen outside the home of Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska in Washington in October 2021.

The next month, FBI agents seized the cell phones and other equipment from McGonigal and Shestakov.

‘Supervised…In Investigations Of Russian Oligarchs, Including Deripaska’

McGonigal got his start with the FBI in 1996, when he was first assigned to the bureau’s New York office, where he worked on “Russian foreign counterintelligence and organized crime matters,” according to his official biography.

He worked for years in Washington on counterespionage cases.

In 2016, he was named special agent in charge of the New York office’s counterintelligence division, where he “supervised and participated in investigations of Russian oligarchs, including Deripaska,” according to the indictment.

According to Senate testimony in 2020 from a top Justice Department official, McGonigal was also instrumental in launching Operation Crossfire Hurricane — the FBI’s investigation into Trump’s campaign and possible links to Russian influence.

In 2018, prosecutors said, McGonigal was introduced by Shestakov to a man who they said “worked for and reported to Deripaska and served as an officer of a corporation that was primarily owned by Deripaska.”

Charles McGonigal


Charles McGonigal

It’s unclear how and when McGonigal and Shestakov first met. However, Shestakov, who had a home in Connecticut, worked as an authorized translator for federal courts and also for the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office, where he likely encountered McGonigal.

Shestakov retired from the Russian foreign service in 1993, and later became a naturalized U.S. citizen.

Like Shestakov, a man identified as “Agent-1” in the indictment worked for the Soviet and Russian foreign ministries. He was also “rumored in public media reports to be a Russian intelligence officer.”

The man is not identified, but Shestakov’s FARA filing, along with other Russian and Western media reports, point to Yevgeny Fokin, currently the director of international cooperation for EN+, the aluminum and power-generation holding company controlled by Deripaska.

Fokin did not respond to messages sent via LinkedIn. An e-mail sent to the EN+ press service was not immediately responded to.

In the spring of 2018, according to the indictment, Shestakov introduced McGonigal to “Agent-1,” who then asked McGonigal for help in arranging an internship for “Agent-1’s” daughter with the New York Police Department. McGonigal agreed to help and informed a supervisor that he wanted to recruit “Agent 1.” It’s unclear if McGonigal was successful.

In September 2018, he retired from the FBI and joined the private sector.

The following year, McGonigal was hired by a Washington law firm to work as a consultant on efforts to get Deripaska removed from the U.S. Treasury’s sanctions list. According to the indictment, he arranged for $25,000 to be sent monthly to a bank account controlled by Shestakov.

While employed by the FBI, McGonigal’s job allowed him to access classified information, including, the indictment said, a then-secret list of Russians who the Treasury Department were considering for sanctions, a list that included Deripaska.

The indictment also alleges that through “Agent-1,” Deripaska hired McGonigal to investigate a rival Russian oligarch.

That tycoon is not named, though the filing indicates he and Deripaska were fighting for control over a “large Russian corporation” and the oligarch might have offshore assets or a foreign citizenship. McGonigal and Shestakov allegedly used pseudonyms in electronic communications to obscure Deripaska’s name, calling him: “you know whom,” and “the big guy,” “our friend from Vienna,” and “the client.”

According to the indictment, McGonigal was negotiating with Agent-1, and Deripaska, in October 2021 for payment for a large number of files found on the “dark web” — part of the Internet that is largely hidden from easy viewing — that reportedly related to the rival oligarch.

The next month, the FBI seized McGonigal’s and Shestakov’s cell phones and computers.

Money Laundering, Not Espionage

Prosecutors’ specific criminal allegations do not address directly McGonigal’s alleged accessing of the classified database, nor do they address the question of his helping the daughter of “Agent 1” gain an internship.

For some legal observers, that’s raised questions about why the Justice Department didn’t file more serious charges. “It may be that prosecutors had reasons for wanting to move now and not later,” Baer told RFE/RL. “If so, they would logically select those charges for which they had the most evidence,” she said. “A prosecutor can always add charges by returning to the grand jury for a superseding indictment.”

Deripaska, for his part, faces his own sanctions-evasion-related criminal charges, unconnected to his alleged payments to McGonigal.

In September 2022, U.S. prosecutors unsealed an indictment accusing him of conspiring to have his girlfriend give birth to their child in the United States, and to hide payments for the effort. A Russian-American woman has been arrested in connection with the case.

In 2020, in an event first described by Business Insider, McGonigal joined a panel discussion at the Washington think tank Atlantic Council, where he discussed corruption at Russia’s main domestic intelligence agency, the Federal Security Service (FSB).

“I think the rule of law under the FSB…has eroded significantly in Russia,” he told the panel. “You are seeing an erosion, I think, in any rule of law as it relates to the FSB and their carrying out their responsibilities as a domestic security agency.”

“It would be akin to having in the United States the FBI as a rogue element, operating at the behest of the highest bidder, engaged in criminal activities,” he said.

Categories
Selected Articles

Suspected Chinese spy balloon ‘likely stole nuclear intel’ in flight over missile silos – Express

Suspected Chinese spy balloon ‘likely stole nuclear intel’ in flight over missile silos  Express
Categories
Selected Articles

Russia’s Military Masses Hundreds of Thousands of Troops for … – Democracy Now!

Russia’s Military Masses Hundreds of Thousands of Troops for …  Democracy Now!
Categories
Selected Articles

Frenemies: US-Israel Spy Strains Emerge Over Iran – SpyTalk

Frenemies: US-Israel Spy Strains Emerge Over Iran  SpyTalk
Categories
Selected Articles

Russia pouring troops into Eastern Ukraine ahead of new offensive – The Telegraph

Russia pouring troops into Eastern Ukraine ahead of new offensive  The Telegraph
Categories
Selected Articles

George Santos – latest news: Congressman officially under House … – msnNOW

George Santos – latest news: Congressman officially under House …  msnNOW
Categories
Selected Articles

Crime and Criminology from Michael_Novakhov (10 sites): InSight Crime: From Worst to Best – Anti-Money Laundering Capabilities in Latin America

From Worst to Best – Anti-Money Laundering Capabilities in Latin America

The latest Basel Institute Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Index bookends its Americas’ rankings with two Caribbean islands while leaving the traditional organized crime havens in the middle of the pack.

The 2022 index placed Haiti in the second-worst position worldwide, unsurprising given how many of its current and former political leaders have faced international sanctions for corruption and financing gangs. The Caribbean, in general, fared poorly with the Bahamas and Saint Kitts and Nevis, also ranking towards the bottom — except for the tiny nation of Dominica, which topped the Americas’ rankings.

The report also had Ecuador, Brazil, and Mexico in the middle of the pack, despite their longstanding role in regional crime. And it showed how the likes of Chile, Uruguay, and Costa Rica have kept the tide at bay, through investments in financial-crime units, specially trained prosecutors, and regular asset seizures. Even Colombia acquitted itself honorably, finishing in a better position than a number of European Union countries.

The Basel Institute says the Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Index is a ranking of 203 countries and jurisdictions based on their respective efforts and capacities to mitigate money laundering. Below, InSight Crime looks at the big winner and the big loser, and a few in between.

The Worst: Haiti

For Basel, Haiti had the worst score in the region in terms of anti-money laundering efforts as well as the second-worst in the world, behind only the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

It was not surprising. Allegations of money laundering have circled Haiti’s political elites at the highest levels. The country’s previous president, Jovenel Moïse, who was assassinated in July 2021, was embroiled in money laundering investigations before he even began his term.

In 2019, the Financial Action Task Force’s (FATF) last evaluation of the country noted that Haiti had “not recorded any successful prosecutions and convictions for money laundering offenses for the past five years.”

And in November last year, both the United States and Canada sanctioned top Haitian politicians over links to drug trafficking and financing gangs. Canada specifically cited money laundering as the motive behind the financial sanctions.

Global Financial Integrity (GFI) drew attention to structural problems that allow Haiti’s politicians to engage in such wanton criminal activity in its 2021 report.

“The constitution grants members of parliament immunity while they are in office, and it cannot be waived by the state in order to prosecute them,” GFI wrote.

SEE ALSO: How Latin America’s Synthetic Drug Traffickers Launder Dirty Cash

One expert told GFI that this results in criminal actors “increasingly running for office and running their criminal enterprises from the top levels of government.”

In fact, according to GFI, the only issue more pervasive in Haiti than money laundering is its corruption, given the two typically work hand-in-hand.

Middle of the Pack: Ecuador, Brazil, and Mexico

The Basel Institute said Ecuador, Brazil, and Mexico shared two key points in common: corruption and bribery accounted for the worst score in each country, while public transparency accounted for the highest.

While Ecuador’s struggles with a very rapid rise in gang violence are well-documented, its money laundering problems remain less understood. The amount of money being laundered in Ecuador reached $3.5 billion in 2021, three times higher than in 2016, according to a newly published report by the Latin American Geopolitical Strategy Center (Centro Estratégico Latinoamericano de Geopolítica – CELAG).

CELAG added that money laundering in the country could account for up to 5 percent of Ecuador’s gross domestic product. The rise in drug trafficking has fuelled most of this rise, said the think tank, with drug proceeds now so plentiful they far outpace Ecuador’s financial investigation capacity.

Brazil also finished in the middle of Basel’s index. Money laundering accusations constantly dogged the presidency and family of Jair Bolsonaro. The former president was embroiled in allegations that he was part of a scheme, known as rachadinha, where a portion of staffers’ salaries would be held back as a bribe in order for them to keep their jobs. His son, Flavio, his ex-wife, and several other Bolsonaro allies have also been under investigation for money laundering.

On a larger scale, the country had to contend with high-profile money laundering cases involving one of its largest cryptocurrency trading companies. And militia groups in Rio de Janeiro — criminal structures often made up of active and retired police — laundered up to three billion reais ($582 million) obtained from a variety of criminal economies over the course of three years, according to statistics from Council for Financial Activities Control (Conselho de Controle de Atividades Financeiras – Coaf), the government’s money-laundering investigative body.

Brazil’s new president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, has faced money laundering scandals of his own, in connection with the sweeping Lava Jato (Car Wash) investigation, which found extensive corruption between Latin American politicians and Brazilian construction giant, Odebrecht, among other schemes. He currently faces a political battle as he tries to reform oversight and accountability for Coaf.

Public transparency and accountability were Mexico’s saving grace. The country’s stringent laws for personal asset declarations and election financing transparency were ranked among the best in the world, at least on paper, by Basel’s anti-money laundering index. But for corruption and bribery, Mexico was judged to be worse than the likes of Russia or Myanmar.

The perceived slowness of Mexico’s investigations into the Odebrecht scandal, when other countries have jailed or impeached a number of suspects, did not help. A lack of big-name convictions and threats made against investigators have only furthered the absence of progress.

And a rise in the trafficking of fentanyl, largely reliant on chemical precursors from China, has also led to Mexican groups pouring millions of dollars into financial schemes with Chinese partners, which are very hard to trace given the lack of support from Chinese authorities.

The Best: Dominica

The small Caribbean island of Dominica had the region’s best overall score in the Basel index, outpacing the world average on political and legal risk, as well as for the risk of corruption, bribery, and general money laundering risk.

However, the experts were not unanimously in agreement on Dominica’s success. While Dominica had the highest ranking for AML effectiveness, according to the Basel Institute’s Index, GFI ranked its effectiveness at 2.5 out of 5, placing it firmly in the middle of the pack for the region.

GFI noted that Dominica’s Financial Services Unit (FSU), which regulates banks and financial institutions as well as fighting against financial crime, has just six staff.

Understaffing and a lack of resources are big problems for the country’s AML preparedness. Still, between 2016 and 2018, Dominica managed to conduct 21 money laundering-related asset seizures and prosecuted seven of the ten money laundering investigations initiated during that time period.

What’s more, Dominica is sparsely populated, is a developing economy, and lacks real estate infrastructure, the most common vehicle for money laundering in Caribbean jurisdictions. The country also engages in relatively little trade, another well-known channel for money laundering, with its combined exports and imports barely exceeding $400 million, according to CIA estimates in 2021.

Notwithstanding its top ranking, Dominica is one of many Caribbean transshipment points for illegal narcotics en route from South America to the European continent. According to the US International Narcotics Control Strategy Report from 2022, this is the primary driver for money laundering on the island.

The post From Worst to Best – Anti-Money Laundering Capabilities in Latin America appeared first on InSight Crime.

6860923 InSight Crime

6869576 Crime and Criminology from Michael_Novakhov (10 sites)

Categories
Selected Articles

The central, complex and enigmatic figure of The Great October 2016 Surprise is James Kallstrom, who saw himself as the actual Director, opposed to the Obama-Comey #FBI. His personality and mechanisms of his powers have to be studied and investigated. Publish ALL his FBI records!

 Michael Novakhov’s favorite articles on Inoreader

Michael Novakhov @mikenov

posted at 14:37:17 UTC by Michael Novakhov via Tweets by ‎@mikenov
The central, complex and enigmatic figure of The Great October 2016 Surprise is James Kallstrom, who saw himself as the actual Director, opposed to the Obama-Comey #FBI. His personality and mechanisms of his powers have to be studied and investigated. Publish ALL his FBI records!

FoXvPSfagAAM_BT.png:large

The Hill @thehill

posted at 14:37:17 UTC by The Hill via Tweets by ‎@mikenov
Michael Novakhov retweeted:
Democrats have a “messaging problem” with voters, despite accomplishments trib.al/G1zaLhu

FoXpajJagAIX3pg.jpg:large

Michael Novakhov @mikenov

posted at 14:37:17 UTC by Michael Novakhov via Tweets by ‎@mikenov
8:54 AM 2/7/2023 – David Warsh: How some rebellious FBI agents pushed Comey into tipping 2016 election to Trump | Selected Articles thenewsandtimes.blogspot.com/2023/02/854-am…

newenglanddiary.com/home/x9hldrnfy…

Michael Novakhov @mikenov

posted at 14:37:17 UTC by Michael Novakhov via Tweets by ‎@mikenov
#devlinbarrett

devlin barrett – Google Search google.com/search?q=devli…

FoXqDr6agAITzcM.png:large

Selected Articles – Michael Novakhov’s favorite articles on Inoreader – The News And Times FBI’s inquiry into Clintons is resurrected WASHINGTON — FBI agents have renewed questions about the dealings of the Clinton Foundation after calls from President Donald Trump and top Republicans for the Justice Department to take a fresh look at politically charged […]

The post 8:54 AM 2/7/2023 – David Warsh: How some rebellious FBI agents pushed Comey into tipping 2016 election to Trump | Selected Articles first appeared on The News And Times.

Michael Novakhov @mikenov

posted at 14:07:25 UTC by Michael Novakhov via Tweets by ‎@mikenov
#devlinbarrett on #FBI and #Election2016

devlin barrett on FBI and Election 2016 – Google Search google.com/search?q=devli… amazon.com/October-Surpri…

Michael Novakhov @mikenov

posted at 13:08:13 UTC by Michael Novakhov via Tweets by ‎@mikenov
Book review of October Surprise: How the FBI Tried to Save Itself and Crashed an Election by Devlin Barrett – The Washington Post washingtonpost.com/outlook/for-co…

resized_272427-08a-ap18005749162136_81-2

WASHINGTON — FBI agents have renewed questions about the dealings of the Clinton Foundation after calls from President Donald Trump and top Republicans for the Justice Department to take a fresh look at politically charged accusations of corruption, people familiar with the investigation said Friday.

The News And Times Information Network – Blogs By Michael Novakhov – thenewsandtimes.blogspot.com
Categories
Selected Articles

COINTELPRO 2.0: How the FBI Infiltrated BLM Protests After Police … – Democracy Now!

COINTELPRO 2.0: How the FBI Infiltrated BLM Protests After Police …  Democracy Now!
Categories
Selected Articles

Headlines for February 07, 2023 – Democracy Now!

Headlines for February 07, 2023  Democracy Now!