Category: Uncategorized
![]() |
Michael_Novakhov shared this story . |
Former President Donald Trump’s photograph is seen on a digital display outside of the venue ahead of his afternoon keynote speech on the final day of the Bitcoin 2024 conference at Music City Center July 27, 2024 in Nashville, Tennessee.
Jon Cherry | Getty Images News | Getty Images
NASHVILLE, Tenn. — A block away from the neon-lit buzz of Lower Broadway, where honky-tonk pours onto the city’s main drag at all hours, stands the Music City Center, a venue that’s hosted everything from craft beer conferences to a performance by the legendary Dolly Parton.
In late July, the complex filled up for something entirely different. It was the biggest bitcoin conference of the year, and the headline act was none other than former President Donald Trump.
For nearly 50 minutes on a Saturday afternoon in the country music capital, the Republican nominee for president extolled the virtues of bitcoin and spelled out what a second Trump administration would mean for the crypto industry to a packed crowd of conferencegoers who’d spent hours getting through the Secret Service’s tight security protocol.
“If crypto is going to define the future, I want it to be mined, minted and made in the USA,” Trump declared, in a message targeted to the industry’s bitcoin miners, who secure the network by running large banks of high-powered machines. “We will be creating so much electricity that you’ll be saying, ‘Please, please, President, we don’t want any more electricity. We can’t stand it!'”
The speech, which read like it was straight out of a bitcoiner’s bible, was quite the about-face for an ex-president who three years earlier had dismissed the cryptocurrency as a “scam.” Trump was, no doubt, lured by the potential of huge amounts of donor money from an industry that sees itself as under constant attack from the Biden-Harris administration and the heavy regulatory hand of SEC Chair Gary Gensler.
Trump told the audience in Nashville that he’d raised $25 million in crypto-related funds, a number that CNBC hasn’t been able to independently verify.
Turning Trump from a skeptic into a sudden bitcoin evangelist took the work, behind closed doors, of a small army of bitcoiners and other crypto advocates who were able to maneuver their way into the candidate’s inner circle. In particular, three friends in Puerto Rico came together to try and convince the Republican presidential hopeful of bitcoin’s value, and to eventually make that position loud and clear to a key audience in Nashville.
Donald Trump during his speech at the 2024 Bitcoin Conference in Nashville, TN.
The Washington Post | The Washington Post | Getty Images
In bitcoin parlance, Trump was “orange-pilled.” It’s a play on the phrase “red pill” from the 1999 film, “The Matrix.” In the movie, the main character, Neo (played by Keanu Reeves), is given a choice of taking a red pill, which offers access to the unsettling truth about the world, or a blue pill, which signifies a false but far more comforting version of reality.
Orange pill refers to bitcoin’s official color and represents a person’s dedication to bitcoin over fiat currencies.
Within the matrix of confidantes, friends, family members, and colleagues united in their mission to orange-pill Trump were the trio of Puerto Rico residents: Amanda Fabiano, the shadow chief of bitcoin miners; Tracy Hoyos-López, a former California prosecutor; and David Bailey, CEO of media group BTC Inc. and organizer of the conference in Nashville.
Earlier this year, Bailey promised to turn out $100 million and 5 million votes for Trump. CNBC is told an update on fundraising numbers is coming soon.
Over Memorial Day weekend at a steak house called Bottles in the Guaynabo suburb of San Juan, the three began mapping out a plan as they shared family-style dishes.
Here’s how Fabiano recounted the initial exchange to CNBC.
“We were at dinner with a bunch of people, and David was like, ‘Hey, I’ve been talking to the administration, and I want to do a roundtable on mining, Can we chat this weekend?'” Fabiano said.
Bailey had spent months in dialogue with the Trump campaign, swapping bitcoin briefs and messages. He was about to make the 1,600-mile trek to meet the former president for the first time at Trump Tower in Manhattan, and was keen to deliver details of a potentially lucrative fundraiser and a miners working group featuring some of the top CEOs in the industry. It would serve as a prelude for what was to come in Nashville.
Hoyos-López, Bailey’s neighbor, had been recently orange-pilled, and was anxious to help out any way she could in getting Trump to Nashville. She happened to have a contact in the Trump orbit who was willing to make an introduction. Meanwhile, Fabiano’s history in bitcoin mining was important in giving the group street cred.
“Without Amanda, we wouldn’t have had the legitimacy to sell that this is a legitimate business,” Hoyos-López said. “She is the mining queen. She’s got all the miners.”
Hoyos-López added that many miners are former Wall Street executives.
“If you want to be taken seriously, you have to take serious people,” she said. “And it doesn’t get any more serious than miners.”
The Trump campaign didn’t respond to multiple inquiries about Trump’s latest crypto fundraising stats, his changed views on bitcoin and the events leading up to his appearance in Nashville.
Tracy Hoyos-López and Amanda Fabiano snapped a quick photo before smartphones were confiscated ahead of the crypto industry roundtable with Donald Trump in Music City Center in Nashville.
Tracy Hoyos-López
‘Who would we put in the room?’
Bitcoin and some other cryptocurrencies are created by miners around the world running high-powered computers that collectively validate transactions and simultaneously create new tokens. Their massive physical presence shows up in the form of sprawling data centers across the globe and offers a tangible image for newbies to understand an otherwise abstract technology.
Fabiano described it as a natural fit “when thinking about how to explain bitcoin to Trump in a way that makes sense.”
Bitcoin often gets a bad rap for the amount of energy it consumes, which is just shy of how much power Egypt uses annually. But as mining requires tremendous amounts of energy, the industry is developing innovative methods of producing and sharing it.
Miners can partner with utilities in a way that allows them to return energy to the grid when there’s excessive demand. They’re also utilizing untapped sources of renewable energy, often concentrated in remote parts of the country, helping to create an economy in areas that would otherwise be dormant. That could all lead to the U.S. becoming a greater producer of energy, which is of particular importance to satisfy the needs of the artificial intelligence boom.
Bailey confirmed that he flew to New York to meet with Trump, but he wouldn’t share specifics about what was said in the meeting. What’s clear is that, soon thereafter, Trump agreed to host about a dozen crypto executives and experts for a 90-minute roundtable in a small tea room at his Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida.
That meeting took place in mid-June, two weeks after the dinner at Bottles.
To get Trump on board with the big shindig in Nashville, Bailey, Fabiano and Hoyos-López knew they needed the right mix of people to clearly explain the virtues of mining and to convince the nominee that donations would be large enough to make the event worth his time.
“It was like, Who would we put in the room? Who would be the best people to explain this, right? Who would be willing to put dollars up, kind of put their skin in the game? And that was how it all got started,” Fabiano said.
Those who committed to going pitched in $500,000 apiece to a fundraising committee, according to multiple attendees.
Fabiano, who had never previously been involved in politics or campaigning, said the biggest concern among prospective attendees was the fear of appearing partisan. She said ahead of the meeting there was “a prep call for agenda items.”
Fabiano put together a presentation for the Trump team with background material on the miners who would be at the Mar-a-Lago roundtable to show that, “We are real people, and we are real businesses, and you should take us seriously.”
With thunderstorms bearing down on the Atlantic coast, the Mar-a-Lago attendees, including representatives from Riot Platforms, Marathon Digital Holdings, Terawulf and Core Scientific, forfeited their smartphones to a Radio Frequency Identification pouch that blocked incoming and outgoing signals. From under a large chandelier, they listened to the former president engage on the nuances of America’s energy deficit, bitcoin mining, AI and competition with China.
“That roundtable really set off like, OK, this industry is real, and they’re showing up with dollars, and they’re showing up with like, actual smart things to say and agenda items that are important to America,” said Fabiano.
After years of facing political backlash, Fabiano said she was glad Trump took an active interest in “digging in and learning about why this industry is real” and “why we’re not a bunch of criminals.”
Fabiano and crew knew they weren’t starting from scratch with Trump.
Bailey started talks with the Trump camp in March. In April, Trump launched his latest nonfungible token collection on the Solana blockchain. In May, he became the first major presidential nominee to accept cryptocurrency donations. He’d started talking on the campaign trail about defending so-called self-custody of coins and vowed at the Libertarian National Convention in May to keep Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and “her goons” away from bitcoin holders.
In early June in San Francisco, technologists, crypto executives and venture capitalists paid up to $300,000 per ticket to join a Trump fundraiser that ultimately raised more than $12 million. The more Trump raised, the more he leaned into his newfound support.
BTC Inc. CEO David Bailey and industry liaison for the Bitcoin Advocacy Project, Tracy Hoyos-López, in the Bitcoin 2024 “war room” ahead of the industry roundtable with Donald Trump.
Tracy Hoyos-López
“There are a lot of people in Trump’s orbit that are fans of bitcoin,” said Bailey. “There are members of his family that are fans of bitcoin. Donald Trump has sold real estate for bitcoin. I just bought a pair of sneakers from him in bitcoin.”
Bailey said Trump’s journey from cynic to fan is relatable. He said Michael Saylor, the billionaire founder of MicroStrategy, was once a skeptic and that he’s been on a personal journey himself for 12 years.
“There is no necessarily single person who’s responsible for orange-pilling him,” Bailey said, of Trump. “I think in terms of him having a 180 on this topic, that is really a very natural thing.”
After months of dialogue with Trump and his aides, Bailey said he thinks the former president’s attraction to bitcoin is that it “represents a transformational opportunity for the country.”
“In that sense, I think it’s kind of a match made in heaven,” he said.
Getting to ‘yes’
Hoyos-López said the period between the Mar-a-Lago meeting in June and the Nashville conference late last month was “agonizing,” as the group waited for an answer.
The first “yes” from the Trump camp was to the meeting in Manhattan, and the news was delivered by phone to Hoyos-López while Bailey was in Japan. The conference was more than a month out. Hoyos-López said she jumped in her car and drove to Bailey’s house so she and his wife, Emily, could prepare the one suit he had in his closet.
“We couldn’t find any dry cleaners that would have this in time in Puerto Rico,” Hoyos-López said. “We ended up having to get super creative, like putting his suit in the dryer, putting his suit in the sun, steaming it.”
There was a lot of work to be done in a little amount of time.
Soon after the Mar-a-Lago roundtable, Trump said yes to Nashville.
“I’m a criminal attorney, I was a prosecutor, so I’m used to dealing with very big and very emotional moments, but not treating them as such,” Hoyos-López said. “While everyone is excited and celebrating, I’m like, ‘Alright, well, we need to sit down and figure out.'”
Three months earlier, Bailey’s wildest dream was to get Trump to Nashville. He talked about it often with his core group of friends in Puerto Rico, a U.S. territory with crypto-friendly policies, including huge tax breaks to those who spend at least 183 days on the island each year.
“Never in a million years, did we think we were going to be here,” Hoyos-López said. “Getting a presidential candidate to the Bitcoin Conference was definitely one of the coolest things that I probably will ever do in my life.”
At the conference, Hoyos-López, Fabiano, and Bailey worked to stage a second roundtable with Trump. They brought in a wider set of industry participants, including the Winklevoss twins, Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal and Cantor Fitzgerald CEO Howard Lutnick. Kid Rock, Billy Ray Cyrus and some top mining executives were also there, along with a smattering of politicians.
Attorney and bitcoiner Tracy Hoyos-López sat down with Donald Trump as part of an industry working group.
Tracy Hoyos-López
Trump, in his keynote, donned a blue-and-white-striped tie and an American flag pinned to the lapel of his navy blue suit. He declared that a Trump White House would “keep 100% of all the bitcoin the U.S. government currently holds or acquires into the future,” and said he would fire SEC Chair Gensler.
To Fabiano, Bailey, and Hoyos-López, the stakes couldn’t possibly be higher, as Democratic nominee Kamala Harris gains momentum in the polls.
“Our industry as a whole will cease to exist if Trump doesn’t win,” Hoyos-López said. “There are some rumors out there that Harris is trying to change her stance on crypto as a whole, and to appear more friendly, but I just don’t believe anything that they say.”
Hoyos-López said she’s now focused on getting out votes and rallying bitcoiners who she says are “single-issue voters.”
“Yes, the money that you get in is very important,” she said. “But what really matters at the end of the day is votes.”
Less than a week after leaving Nashville, Fabiano, Hoyos-López, and Bailey were back together closer to home to process all that had happened. They met at a restaurant called Santaella and shared a mix of Puerto Rican tapas, including a personal favorite — goat cheese quesadilla with nuts and honey on top.
“We just sat down and had a conversation about like, ‘Holy crap. We did this,'” Hoyos-Lopez said. “We created the table, and we brought everyone to the table, which is literally what this community is all about.”
WATCH: Trump caters to crypto crowd
![]() |
Michael_Novakhov shared this story . |
Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov was detained at a Paris airport for allegedly enabling criminal activity with his encrypted messaging app, French media reported Saturday.
France issued an arrest warrant for Durov on charges of complicity in drug trafficking, crimes against children and fraud due to the lack of moderation on Telegram and his failure to cooperate with law enforcement, the TF1, LCI and BFMTV media outlets reported.
The 39-year-old billionaire was detained on the tarmac of Paris-Le Bourget Airport after his private jet landed from Azerbaijan, TF1 reported.
TF1 quoted an anonymous investigator as saying that Durov would most likely be placed in pre-trial detention.
“On his platform, he allowed an incalculable number of offenses and crimes to be committed, for which he did nothing to moderate or cooperate [with law enforcement],” TF1 quoted a source close to the case as saying.
The arrest warrant was reportedly only valid in France.
Durov allegedly knew that he was “persona non grata” in France, rarely traveled to Europe and avoided countries where Telegram was under surveillance by security forces, a source close to the investigation told TF1.
“He made a mistake tonight. We don’t know why… Was this flight just a stopover? In any case, he’s in custody,” TF1 quoted the source as saying.
Telegram is widely used by Russian speakers.
It has become a key platform for sharing information about the war in Ukraine and is reportedly used by the Russian military to communicate.
“Telegram is the main social media network through which open-source information is spread about the war. That includes footage but also opinions and analysis from Russian and Ukrainian military sources. A significant change to Telegram’s policies could have a significant effect on the information domain for this war,” military expert Rob Lee said on X (formerly Twitter).
Deputy Russian State Duma Speaker Vladislav Davankov said he had sent an appeal to Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov to seek Durov’s release.
“His arrest may be politically motivated and a tool to gain access to the personal information of Telegram users. This must not be allowed,” the state-run RIA Novosti news agency quoted Davankov as saying.
The Russian-born boss of Telegram, which he says boasts over 900 million users, is currently based in Dubai. He became a naturalized French citizen in August 2021.
Durov, also the founder of the VKontakte social network, left Russia in 2014 after he refused to share VKontakte users’ data with Russian security services. Russia later unsuccessfully attempted to block Telegram over its refusal to provide users’ online communications to security services.
“His non-cooperation with the FSB in favor of free speech is unfortunately completely neutralized by his non-cooperation with anyone to stop Telegram from being used for all these terrible things. It was his choice. Was it possible to do one and not do the other?” wrote investigative journalist Christo Grozev.
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia’s Prosecutor General’s Office has designated The Moscow Times as an “undesirable” organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a “foreign agent.”
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work “discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership.” We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It’s quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you’re defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
$10 / month
$15 / month
Other
Continue
Not ready to support today?
Remind me later.
![]() |
Michael_Novakhov shared this story . |
CNN
—
For the better part of the past year, as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. built and maintained a small but significant base of support for his quixotic White House bid, the two major parties wrestled with an increasingly pressing question: Whose presidential aspirations might be most damaged by an independent aligned with the conspiratorial right but bearing a famous Democratic name?
Now, with Kennedy having suspended his campaign, both parties will be closely watching who his followers gravitate toward in the closing months before Election Day.
Kennedy formally announced Friday that he was suspending his presidential campaign, saying, “I cannot, in good conscience, ask my staff and volunteers to keep working their long hours, or ask my donors to keep giving when I cannot honestly tell them that I have a real path to the White House.”
He then said he would “throw (his) support to President Trump.” Speculation around an endorsement of former President Donald Trump had earlier grown as both candidates were scheduled to appear in Arizona on Friday, and Trump teased a “special guest” at his event.
Though his odds of victory were quickly diminishing – a recent CBS News poll measured his support at just 2% – Kennedy’s decision to bow out 74 days before the election nevertheless presents another twist to a race already unlike any other. And amid a momentum shift that has catapulted the newly installed Democratic nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris, into close contention with Trump, there is hope within the former president’s operation that Kennedy’s exit could prove decisive if certain battlegrounds are decided by thousands of ballots, just as they were in 2020.
It’s hardly certain what Kennedy’s backers will do. Whether many of them ever intended to vote for him or at all is difficult to gauge, and some may choose to sit the election out without an alternative on the ballot.
Still, the Trump campaign has long worried that Kennedy’s campaign, built on conspiracies and anti-vaccine rhetoric, pulled directly from their side, especially in a handful of key states. Trump’s advisers now see an opening to court some of Kennedy’s voters, particularly those Americans who sit at the overlap between supporters of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders’ past presidential campaigns and the GOP’s anti-establishment right wing. There is a presumption among Trump’s team and his allies that conservative-leaning mothers – a demographic the Republican nominee has struggled to win over – could also be swayed. Women were more likely to support Kennedy than men, according to a recent Pew Research Center survey, though other polls haven’t shown a meaningful difference.
As it became clear that Kennedy’s days in the race were numbered, several of Trump’s top allies, including his son, Donald Trump Jr., have maneuvered behind the scenes to arrange for an endorsement. Meanwhile, the former president has showered Kennedy in overtures, telling CNN he might find a place for his onetime rival in a future Cabinet.
“If he endorsed me, I would be honored by it,” Trump said Thursday on Fox News. “I would be very honored by it. He really has his heart in the right place.”
The Democratic National Committee and aligned outside groups have aggressively attacked Kennedy since the beginning of this year in an attempt to minimize his impact on the race. In a memo released Friday, Ramsey Reid, the committee’s operative keeping an eye on third-party candidates, argued that Kennedy dropping out wouldn’t affect the race, pointing to recent polls showing his support declining.
“Here’s what RFK Jr.’s endorsement of Donald Trump would change: nothing,” Reid said in the memo. “The little support that remains is soft, split across ideologies, and disproportionately among lower propensity voters.”
Still, amid the uncertainty, the Harris campaign extended an olive branch to Kennedy’s backers.
“If they were looking for somebody who’s actually going to fight for their interests, their values, or they’re looking for somebody who understood as it relates to the personal decisions that they make in their lives, the government should get the hell out of the way,” Harris spokesman Michael Tyler said, “then there’s a home for them in Kamala Harris campaign.”
An alternative to Biden and Trump
Kennedy first entered the race in April 2023 as a Democratic challenger to President Joe Biden. In October, he ended that bid and announced he would instead run as an independent candidate.
Armed with a storied family lineage – he’s the son of the late Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy and the nephew of President John F. Kennedy – and a cult following from his years of environmental activism and as a leading purveyor of debunked vaccine conspiracies, Kennedy quickly found an audience of Americans disenchanted by the two major parties and a rematch between the two oldest presidents to hold the office.
Though his national support peaked in the teens and has lately fallen to low single digits, Kennedy’s campaign generated fears from both parties that he could tip a critical state or two.
At the Republican National Convention last month, Trump co-campaign manager Chris LaCivita told a room full of reporters that their internal polling predicted Kennedy siphoned slightly more votes from Democrats in Michigan and Wisconsin but “much more from us” in Pennsylvania, whose 19 Electoral College votes are one of this year’s top prizes and could determine the election.
Asked why, LaCivita responded, “I don’t know. I haven’t figured it out yet.”
Democrats, meanwhile, have waged an offensive against Kennedy over the past year, seeking to portray him as a spoiler for Trump by highlighting his ties to megadonor Timothy Mellon, who has donated to super PACs backing both Trump and Kennedy.
The DNC and Clear Choice PAC actively fought Kennedy’s efforts to get on the ballot in 11 states, each of them a battleground or a Democratic stronghold. Kennedy had won all of the legal battles he faced against Democrats in various states up until a New York judge blocked him from appearing on the state’s ballot earlier this month.
Kennedy’s campaign and its underdog operation had spent countless hours, not to mention tens of millions of dollars, working to achieve their goal of gaining ballot access nationwide. Kennedy has qualified for the ballot in 21 states, although it’s unclear whether his name will appear on ballots in those states without him in the race. On Thursday, he withdrew from the ballot in Arizona, the office of the state’s secretary of state told CNN.
If Kennedy drops out, he will have spurned several minor parties who nominated him as their presidential candidate to grant him ballot access in select states. The fate of those minor parties, who in some states earn ballot access based on performance in previous elections, could be in jeopardy.
Trump’s campaign went on offense early against Kennedy’s independent bid, labeling him a radical liberal and promoting his more progressive beliefs. The attacks escalated further in the spring of 2024 as more public and internal polling revealed that Kennedy took as much support from Trump as from Biden.
By May, Trump’s advisers and outside allies went from viewing Kennedy as a nuisance to a real problem that needed extinguishing. Trump himself personally weighed in, urging undecided Americans not to cast a “wasted protest vote.”
Frustration mounted as well with the friendly coverage Kennedy enjoyed into the summer from conservative media – not only Fox News and Newsmax but also among conservative influencers.
“That coverage was a major reason Don Jr. began pushing for a way to get (Kennedy) to end his campaign,” a source familiar with the talks said.
Within Trump’s political orbit, an alliance with Kennedy was never far from a possibility.
Roger Stone, the longtime Republican operative close to the former president, suggested in the summer of 2023 that Kennedy could be a contender for a Cabinet post in a second Trump term. In April, a Kennedy campaign official based in New York was fired by the campaign after she repeatedly urged voters to vote for Kennedy to improve Trump’s chances of victory in blue states such as New York. To Democrats, the episode confirmed what they viewed as an uncomfortable coziness between the efforts behind Trump and Kennedy.
Privately, the lines of communication remained open between their extended political orbits. Discussions between Trump allies and advisers and Kennedy’s team began in the lead-up to the Republican convention in July. Kennedy’s son, Bobby Kennedy III, posted video of a friendly phone call between his father and Trump the same month.
During the conversation, the former president appeared to endorse false theories about the safety of vaccines – a longtime focal point of Kennedy’s public advocacy. The elder Kennedy apologized to Trump for the release of the video of their phone call, which was later deleted.
At an event last month, Kennedy acknowledged for the first time that his path to victory was shrinking and asserted that Trump was “highly likely to be the next president.”
Then, on Tuesday, Kennedy’s running mate, Nicole Shanahan, opened the door to “joining forces” with Trump to prevent Harris from winning the election.
Donald Trump Jr. had been pushing his father and the Trump campaign for weeks to encourage Kennedy to end his bid and endorse the former president, according to a source with knowledge of the conversations.
In addition to Trump Jr., former Fox News host Tucker Carlson – who is close to Kennedy – as well as businessman Omeed Malik, a Trump donor who has also given to Kennedy’s campaign, have helped facilitate the talks.
An endorsement, if it happens, could come as soon as Friday night at Trump’s Phoenix-area rally. Trump said Thursday that “no plans have been made.” Kennedy is scheduled to address “the present historical moment and his path forward” at an event not far away just hours earlier. It will be Kennedy’s first public event since July.
Internal conversations within Trump’s operation had for months focused on whether Kennedy’s endorsement would bring any benefit. Kennedy was a mercurial figure long before his run for president, and he has managed to amass more controversies during his 16-month-long quest for the White House.
In May, Kennedy disclosed for the first time that a parasitic worm once entered his brain and died, a period that led to “brain fog” and “having trouble with word retrieval and short-term memory,” he said. Later in the campaign, he sidestepped accusations published in Vanity Fair that he sexually assaulted a former nanny, telling a podcast he had “many skeletons in my closet.”
“I’m not a church boy,” Kennedy said when asked about the allegations.
The same Vanity Fair article also published an image of Kennedy, sent by him to a friend, which appeared to depict Kennedy pantomiming eating a dog carcass. Kennedy has denied the photo showed him eating a dog.
Earlier this month, Kennedy admitted that a decade ago he placed in New York City’s Central Park a bear cub carcass he found on the road upstate, an incident that appears tied to a 2014 episode that drew national attention.
However, any hesitance inside Trump’s campaign about a Kennedy endorsement eroded when Biden ended his campaign in late July and it became clear that Harris would likely top the Democratic ticket. It was at that point that more people in Trump’s orbit, including several of his most senior advisers, came to believe that Kennedy’s support would be an asset in a race that could be determined by the smallest of margins, two people close to the talks said.
“The team recognized that RFK Jr. could be more hurtful to Trump after that. It quickly became clear that pulling his voters to our side could give us an edge, and the talks happening in the background to secure his endorsement became more serious,” a source familiar with the talks told CNN.
While Trump has long espoused some of the conspiracies around routine inoculations that Kennedy has pushed for years – including the debunked links between certain vaccines and autism – the two were for a time on opposing sides of the coronavirus vaccine. Kennedy had made Trump’s handling of the Covid-19 pandemic and his implementation of Operation Warp Speed, the program to accelerate the manufacturing of Covid-19 vaccines, a major theme of his early campaign.
As Kennedy’s campaign picked up support, Trump labeled the former Democrat a member of the “radical left” and attacked his environmental activism.
But in July, Trump and Kennedy spoke on the phone in the days after the former president survived an assassination attempt at a campaign rally in Pennsylvania. The day after the call, Kennedy and Trump met in person in Milwaukee on the first day of the Republican National Convention.
In those conversations, the candidates first discussed the possibility of Kennedy dropping out of the race and endorsing the former president in exchange for a role in a future Trump administration. Following those conversations, Kennedy said he would not drop out of the race.
Earlier this month, Kennedy’s campaign approached the vice president’s campaign about arranging a meeting to discuss endorsing her in exchange for a potential role in a Harris administration. That meeting never materialized.
Shanahan on Thursday lashed out at Democrats, suggesting they would be to blame if Kennedy’s supporters helped push Trump over the top in November.
Her “old Dem buddies,” she wrote on social media, are “terrified of the idea of our movement joining forces with Donald Trump.”
“Here’s an idea: stop suing us. Let us debate. Quit rigging the media and the polls. It’s a simple formula people – get with it,” Shanahan said.
This headline and story have been updated with additional developments.
CNN’s Kristen Holmes, Kate Sullivan and Ethan Cohen contributed to this report.
![]() |
Michael_Novakhov shared this story from ![]() |
Federal law enforcement is doing ‘everything wrong’ in their investigation of the attempted assassination against Donald Trump, claims Sen. Ron Johnson.
The ranking member of the Senate Homeland Security Committee told <a href=”http://DailyMail.com” rel=”nofollow”>DailyMail.com</a> that the actions of the Justice Department are ‘jaw dropping’ and slammed the agency’s law enforcement arm – the FBI – for thinking they are ‘above the law.’
He also said it was suspicious that would be assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks’ body was cremated almost immediately after he was shot and killed at the rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.
Crooks, 20, was gunned down by Secret Service right after one of his bullets grazed the former president’s right ear during the attack on on June 13 that left one supporter dead and two others critically injured.
And amid a still ongoing investigation into the events that transpired that day, Crooks’ body was already released and cremated despite lingering questions from lawmakers.
‘I think the FBI, Department of Justice, Secret Service are doing everything exactly wrong,’ Johnson told <a href=”http://DailyMail.com” rel=”nofollow”>DailyMail.com</a> at Trump Tower in Chicago on Monday. ‘If you want people to have confidence in the investigation, it needs to be transparent.’
Sen. Ron Johnson (right) told <a href=”http://DailyMail.com” rel=”nofollow”>DailyMail.com</a> that ‘the FBI, Department of Justice, Secret Service are doing everything exactly wrong’ in the investigation of the assassination attempt against Donald Trump
‘What we know about the events of July 13 is coming primarily from local law enforcement,’ the furious senator explained.
Multiple congressional committees, including the one Johnson serves on as the top Republican, have questions about the assassination attempt and what could have been done to prevent it.
But Johnson says that they are being stonewalled by the FBI, DOJ and United States Secret Service (USSS).
‘From standpoint of federal law enforcement, they are the law. They believe they’re pretty much above the law, and they’ve never been held accountable,’ the Wisconsin lawmaker said. ‘They don’t believe they really need to be held accountable to the American public. They can avoid scrutiny. So that’s how they’re handling this investigation.’
‘Personally, it’s jaw dropping to me that they would cremate the body before all the autopsy reports were presented to the public,’ he continued.
‘It just boggles your mind how they’re approaching this. They’re doing everything exactly wrong if their goal was to instill confidence in an independent and fair and honest investigation.
‘People are suspicious, and I think justifiably so,’ Johnson lamented after speaking at a press conference for Trump in Chicago on the sidelines of the Democratic National Convention.
Trump took a bullet to his ear during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania on July 13. With blood streaked across his face, Secret Service agents corralled the former president off the stage
Pennsylvania native Thomas Matthew Crooks, 20, was shot dead by U.S. Secret Service after he opened fire at Trump’s Butler rally and shot the former president in the ear, killing one rally goer and critically injuring two others
Butler cops say they told Secret Service to station guys on roof
Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%
0:00
LIVE
Crooks was able to get atop a roof little more than a football field’s distance away from where Trump was speaking in Butler, Pennsylvania for a rally days before the Republican National Convention.
The 20-year-old brought an AR-style rifle purchased legally by his father atop a manufacturing building where he took aim at the former president and Republican 2024 nominee.
Crooks’ car was parked nearby the rally with explosives inside, and more bombs were found at his parent’s home, where he lived.
One bullet grazed Trump’s ear on July 13 and was only millimeters from striking his head and potentially resulting in a fatal hit.
Johnson says that his team has requested the agencies probing the attempt turn over interviews they conducted with witnesses and those involved in security the day of the assassination attempt.
His advice for the FBI and USSS: ‘What they could do to provide greater confidence is turn over their transcribed interviews.’
‘We requested them,’ he noted, adding: ‘We haven’t gotten squat.’
‘So again, they’re being almost completely opaque in this thing. And that’s making people suspicious, that’s reducing confidence in their ultimate investigation.’
Johnson said while his committee is investigating the attack against Trump, he fears that the probe is instead turning into an ‘investigation of the investigation.’
![]() |
Michael_Novakhov shared this story from ![]() |
(Bloomberg) — German Chancellor Olaf Scholz is getting left behind by the international effort to help Ukraine stand up to Russia and has no obvious way back into the fold.
Most Read from Bloomberg
The 63-year-old Social Democrat has resisted directly supplying tanks and other heavy weapons to Ukraine and opposed an embargo of Russian oil and gas. His policies have him in a tight corner and risk holding back Germany’s allies just as Russia embarks on a new offensive in eastern Ukraine.
After bringing Germany’s defense policy more in line with its partners in the early stages of Vladimir Putin’s invasion, Scholz has failed to keep pace with the changing dynamics. Evidence of war crimes by Russian troops and Ukraine’s tenacious defense have led to calls for more aggressive action, especially by fellow NATO members in the Baltics.
“Now is not the time for sitting on the fence or showing a mere token support to Ukraine,” Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis told reporters on Wednesday at a news conference in Riga, standing next to German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock.
He also called on Germany to “do the right thing” and back a proposal to sanction Russian oil imports in the next package of European Union measures.
“We understand that it is a very difficult political and economic decision that has to be explained to the people in Germany,” Landsbergis said. “But I think that in this case, probably it’s unavoidable.”
Donald Tusk, the former president of the European Council, was more blunt.
“The Germans must firmly support Ukraine today if we are to believe that they have drawn conclusions from their own history,” he said on Twitter.
After a video call with Group of Seven counterparts on Tuesday, Scholz had an opportunity to counter mounting criticism. Instead, he obfuscated. He said Germany didn’t have equipment to send Ukraine, questioned the ability of Kyiv’s military to operate modern weapons systems and insisted Berlin wouldn’t become directly involved in the war.
While Scholz did offer to pay for certain orders from German defense suppliers, there was a catch: modern heavy weapons such as Leopard and Marder tanks weren’t on offer, according to Ukraine’s envoy in Berlin.
“The weapons that we need aren’t on this list,” Ambassador Andrij Melnyk told public broadcaster ZDF after Scholz’s press conference. “We believe that the Germany military would still be able to supply us with weapons that are required right now.”
Melnyk met with senior officials from Scholz’s party on Wednesday to make his case for heavy weapons and smooth over a flap triggered by the envoy’s criticism of German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier over close relations to Putin when he was foreign minister. After the meeting, he told RTL television that the two sides were “still moving too slowly” toward one another.
‘Sea Change’
In late February, Scholz shocked critics by trashing Germany’s long tradition of not sending weapons to conflict zones and decided to deliver hundreds of anti-tank and anti-air missiles to Ukraine. In a historic policy shift, he also announced a 100 billion-euro ($108 billion) fund to bolster Germany’s military capabilities after years of neglect.
He’s now offering to provide ammunition and train Ukraine forces on a self-propelled, rapid-fire artillery system, according to a senior government official. But the equipment will be supplied via the Netherlands.
Scholz’s current stance has been criticized by members from his ruling alliance. Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, a senior lawmaker from the Free Democrats, said the chancellor’s plans for weapons deliveries on Tuesday fell short.
“You have to fight for freedom and human rights, and there wasn’t enough concrete information on that,” she said on Twitter. “We’re still too far behind.”
Anton Hofreiter, a veteran lawmaker from the Greens, echoed those comments in an interview with Augsburger Allgemeine newspaper, warning that a third world war could break out if Ukraine doesn’t stop Putin.
‘Boys and Girls’
Questions have also been raised about Germany’s resistance to energy sanctions. A national effort to optimize supplies and reduce demand could offset Russian gas supplies as soon as this winter, according to a report by Berlin-based thinktank DIW.
While Scholz — who succeeded Angela Merkel in December — can’t immediately undo years of underspending on defense or recreate Germany’s energy system in a few months, he could be more forceful in his response. Instead, he’s been dismissive, referring to critics as “boys and girls.”
In a commentary on Wednesday, Bild newspaper accused Scholz of failing to making a series of mistakes in Ukraine, including failing to protect Germany’s national interests by stopping Putin and insufficiently distancing himself from his former boss Gerhard Schroeder and other Social Democrats with ties to Russia.
Still, Scholz’s cautious approach has received backing from his cabinet. Finance Minister Christian Lindner — also the head of the FDP — told Bloomberg TV Wednesday that Germany was “open” to deliver further weapons but only “under the condition” that Germany’s defense responsibilities aren’t affected and the country doesn’t become an actor in the war.
Economy Minister Robert Habeck — a former co-leader of the Greens — supported Scholz’s plans to replace Soviet-model weapons sent from Eastern European partners with modern equipment.
“The federal government is acting and will ensure that the quality and quantity of direct and indirect arms deliveries continue to increase rapidly,” he said in an interview with the Rheinische Post newspaper.
But pressure is growing and is unlikely to let up. The opposition CDU is calling for parliamentary debate on Germany’s Ukraine policy, and Scholz has left himself with little wiggle room.
“We’re half-hearted,” said Johann Wadepfuhl, deputy parliamentary leader for the conservative party. “We’re not completely on the side of the Ukrainians, and this is a serious geopolitical mistake for which Olaf Scholz is responsible.”
(Updates with comments from Poland’s Tusk and Green lawmaker)
Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek
©2022 Bloomberg L.P.
![]() |
Michael_Novakhov shared this story from ![]() |
- “Contested Airspace” — Russian Air Attack Lacks Su-57 Stealth, Can’t Defeat Ukraine’s Air Defenses Warrior Maven
- Uptick in Combat Missions Signals Changing Role for Russia’s Air Force in Ukraine The Moscow Times
- Air Superiority in Ukraine Army Technology
- Former US Navy Operations Specialist explains why Russian Air Force pilots have the capability to defeat Uk… The Aviation Geek Club
- View Full Coverage on Google News
![]() |
Michael_Novakhov shared this story . |
A slowly regenerating Russian army is making incremental gains in eastern Ukraine against valiant but under-equipped Ukrainian forces. The United States and its allies are racing to deliver the enormous quantities of weaponry the Ukrainians urgently need if they are to hold the Russians at bay.
Both sides are fighting furiously, both sides are suffering heavy casualties, and for both sides it has become a race against time.
If the Ukrainians can hold out long enough for the new weaponry to arrive, there is a good chance they cannot only reverse Russia’s gains but inflict a decisive defeat that could inhibit Russian ambitions in Europe for years, analysts and U.S. and Western officials say.
The Russians are under pressure to make gains before the new weapons arrive and before their own exhausted troops and depleted armor reach the limits of their capacity to advance. The Russian military is in the process of reviving and resupplying their forces, resurrecting units that were depleted or destroyed in the first weeks of fighting, and slowly but steadily funneling them into eastern Ukraine.
The Russians are also stepping up missile strikes against fuel and ammunition storage depots and critical infrastructure such as railway lines used for the delivery of weapons. A growing shortage of fuel across Ukraine has stirred concerns about its ability to sustain supplies of fuel to the front lines.
“The question is, can we crush the Russians before the Russians get back on their feet?” said Ben Hodges, a former commanding general of the U.S. Army in Europe. “If we are not able to deliver enough of the things Ukraine needs to disrupt and destroy Russian artillery, Russian rocket fire and Russian forces before the Russians complete their reconstitution, then this could drag on for a very long time.”
“Then they’ll consolidate and wait for us to lose interest,” he added.
By aiming for a Ukrainian victory, the United States and its allies are casting a vote of faith in the Ukrainian military, whose performance has far exceeded initial expectations, as well as recognizing that Russia’s army is far less capable than had been assumed. It’s a major strategic shift from the first weeks of the war, when the Biden administration was making plans for a Ukrainian government-in-exile to be based in Warsaw.
The goal now is what Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin called a “weakened” Russia, one that won’t be able in the future to “do the kinds of things that it has done in invading Ukraine.”
But first the supplies of weaponry, notably long-range artillery, have to be delivered, and the Ukrainians have to be trained to use new Western systems, a process that is underway but will take weeks more. The United States and its allies are speeding up the deliveries they’ve promised. But transferring them from Eastern Europe into Ukraine is going to require an unprecedented logistical effort at a time when the main supply lines are increasingly being targeted by Russian missiles, Hodges said.
– – –
New Russian tactics for new terrain
In recent days, the pace of what the Pentagon has described as “anemic” Russian advances of about a mile a day has slowed. The Ukrainians, meanwhile, are retaking territory in some areas, notably around the northeastern town of Kharkiv, where military officials said Thursday they have launched a counteroffensive.
Russia has not yet demonstrated it can overcome the multiple shortcomings that thwarted its attempt to seize Kyiv, including logistics problems, poor command and control and the low morale of its troops, officials say.
But the Russians have adapted their tactics to the open, flat terrain of the Donbas region, which gives them an advantage over the nimbler but less heavily armed Ukrainian military. The Russians’ slow pace appears to be a deliberate effort to mitigate the heavy casualties they suffered in the first weeks of the war, when armored columns surged down tree-lined roads and became easy prey for Ukrainian ambush teams.
Now the Russians are standing back from Ukrainian lines, pounding towns and villages with artillery, then moving in when the Ukrainians are forced under withering fire to withdraw.
[Defenders inside Ukrainian steel mill refuse to surrender to Russian forces]
In some instances, the Russians are then abandoning the villages and the Ukrainians are simply moving back in, U.S. officials say. With territory changing hands on a daily basis along a 300-mile front line, it is hard in some places to discern which side has the advantage.
It’s a punishing, scorched-earth warfare that takes a heavy toll on civilians. Videos posted on pro-Russian social media show Russian forces moving into destroyed, depopulated villages, rendered uninhabitable by the force of the fire rained down on them.
It’s also taking a toll on the Ukrainian military, which is starting to feel the strain of more than two months of continual fighting on multiple fronts, Ukrainians have acknowledged.
The Ukrainians have refrained from issuing their own casualty figures, but for the first time they are admitting that they are suffering heavy losses.
The Russians are losing soldiers at a higher rate than the Ukrainians, “but we are not super people. We have casualties as well,” Oleksandr Danylyuk, a defense and intelligence adviser to the Ukrainian government, said in an interview.
– – –
Burning through huge amounts of everything
The Ukrainians’ most urgent need is heavy caliber, long-range artillery to let them strike deep behind Russian lines, he and other military experts say. The first of the 155 mm Howitzers promised by the United States have reached the front lines and are being used, Austin told a Senate hearing on Tuesday.
Further U.S. deliveries will include Humvees, M-113 armored personnel carriers, Mi-17 helicopters, along with hundreds of thousands of rounds of ammunition, and other allies have pledged additional supplies.
The fighting is so ferocious that Ukraine is burning through huge amounts of everything it needs, from ammunition to armored vehicles, drones and fuel, Danylyuk said. “We are so far from actually reaching our needs it is difficult even to comment,” he said.
The Russians have “changed their strategy to a much better one. They’ve started treating Ukrainian forces as a serious opponent, which is not good for us,” he added. “Our troops still have superiority in terms of professionalism and knowledge of the terrain. But the price of that success is very high.”
Ukraine’s backers are watching anxiously yet hopefully. “Probably, these hours for the Ukrainian army are the darkest and most decisive hours of all,” said Kusti Salm, the permanent secretary in the Ministry of Defense of Estonia, which has been one of Ukraine’s staunchest supporters.
He said he is confident the Ukrainians “can hold the front.” Then, once the weapons arrive, he said, “there will be a turning point where it will become easier for the Ukrainians to achieve their goals.”
In some ways, they already have. By forcing the Russians to undertake a humiliating retreat from the battle for Kyiv, the Ukrainians have secured their capital and their sovereignty, and the war has turned into a fight over how much Russia will have to show for its effort to capture the country, said Rob Lee, a former U.S. Marine who is now with the Foreign Policy Research Institute.
In narrowing their goals to the Donbas area and the southeast of Ukraine, the Russians are able to bring greater force to bear in those places than they did when they were still fighting around Kyiv. The Russian force, though heavily depleted by massive casualties in the first weeks of the war, still has offensive capability. If the Russians are able to continue to amass forces, it is likely they will make further gains, Lee said.
But Russia also will eventually run out of personnel, said Phillips O’Brien, professor of strategic studies at Scotland’s St Andrews University. There is speculation that President Vladimir Putin will announce a mass mobilization that would potentially bring hundreds of thousands of recruits into the army. But it would take up to a year to train and equip them for the battlefield, O’Brien said.
“They have to get what they want and hold it relatively soon,” he said. “In the immediate period the Russians have more force. At some point the Ukrainians will start redressing that balance as they receive supplies.”
U.S. and Western officials have not clearly defined what a Ukrainian victory would look like, but Austin and other U.S. officials have repeatedly said that Ukraine “can win,” while stressing that the coming weeks will be critical.
British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss stated last month that the ultimate goal is to eject Russia entirely from Ukraine, including all the areas it captured in 2014, but most military experts think that is not feasible. A more achievable outcome would be to roll Russian lines back to where they were when Russia launched the February invasion, but that also will be tough, experts say.
“What’s important is that Putin is seen to fail,” said a Western official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive issues. “What that looks like might vary.”