WASHINGTON (AP) ā It raised eyebrows six weeks ago when Saudi Arabiaās aged king, Salman, named his son, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, as prime minister. The kingdomās laws designate the king as prime minister. King Salman had to declare a temporary exception to loan out the title, and at the same time made clear he retains key duties.
But that move reaped dividends Thursday, when the Biden administration declared that Prince Mohammedās standing as prime minister shielded him from a U.S. lawsuit over what the U.S. intelligence community says was his role in Saudi officialsā 2018 killing of a U.S.-based journalist. A judge will now decide whether Prince Mohammed has immunity.
National Security Council spokesman John Kirby insisted Friday that the administrationās declaration of immunity for Saudi Arabiaās crown prince was purely a ālegal determinationā that āhas absolutely nothing to do with the merits of the case itself.ā
Many experts in international law agreed with the administration ā but only because of the kingās late September title boost for the crown prince, ahead of a scheduled U.S. decision.
āIt would have been just as remarkable for the United States to deny MBSās head-of-state immunity after his appointment as Prime Minister as it would have been for the United States to recognize MBSās head-of-state immunity before his appointment,ā William S. Dodge, a professor at the University of California-Davis School of Law, wrote, using the princeās initials.
State Department spokesman Vedant Patel gave examples Friday of past instances of the U.S. recognizing immunity for heads of government or state ā Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe and Narendra Modi of India, both in allegations of rights abuses.
The lawsuit was filed in federal court in Washington by the fiancĆ©e of slain journalist Jamal Khashoggi and by a D.C.-based rights group he founded. It accuses the crown prince and about 20 aides, officers and others of plotting and carrying out Khashoggiās slaying at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul.
The killing, condemned by Biden on the campaign trial in 2019 as āflat-out murderā that must have consequences for Saudi rulers, is at the core of a rift between strategic partners, the United States and Saudi Arabia.
Before and immediately after taking office, Biden vowed to take a stand on Saudi Arabiaās crown prince, as part of a presidency that would be based on rights and values. But Biden has since offered a fist bump and other conciliatory gestures in hopes ā disappointed so far ā of persuading the crown prince to pump more oil for world markets.
Bidenās administration argues that Saudi Arabia is too important to the global economy and to regional security to allow the United States to walk away from the decades-old partnership.
But rights advocates, some senior Democratic lawmakers, and Khashoggiās newspaper, The Washington Post, on Friday condemned the administrationās move.
āJamal died again today,ā Khashoggiās fiancee, Hatice Cengiz, tweeted.
Fred Ryan, publisher of the Post, called it a ācynical, calculated effortā to manipulate the law and shield Prince Mohammed. Khashoggi wrote columns for the Post that in his last months criticized the crown princeās rights abuses.
āBy going along with this scheme, President Biden is turning his back on fundamental principles of press freedom and equality,ā Ryan wrote.
Cengiz and Khashoggiās rights group, Democracy for the Arab World Now, or DAWN, had argued that the crown princeās late September title change was no more than a maneuver to escape U.S. courts, without legal standing or any change in authority or duties.
Saudi Arabia has not commented publicly on the administrationās decision. Spokespeople with the Saudi Embassy and Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment Friday.
Saudi Arabia blames what it says were ārogueā officials for Khashoggiās killing. It says the prince played no part.
Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarchy, as opposed to a constitutional one like the United Kingdom, where a prime minister rather than king or queen governs.
āPretty pathetic,ā Sarah Leah Whitson, head of Khashoggiās rights group, said Friday of the title change.
āIf anything, it just demonstrated how afraid Mohammed bin Salman was and has been of our lawsuit and actual accountability and actual discovery of his crimes,ā Whitson said.
The Biden administration appeared to dismiss her groupās argument that Prince Mohammedās recent title change ran counter to Saudi Arabiaās governing law and should be disregarded.
King Salman has continued making appointments and presiding over meetings of his council since the title change.
But Prince Mohammed for years has been a key decision-maker and actor in the kingdom, including representing the king abroad.
Some Western news outlets had presented the temporary transfer of the prime minister title as King Salman ā who is in his late 80s ā devolving responsibility to Prince Mohammed, who is 37.
A federal judge had given the U.S. until Thursday to offer an opinion, or not, on the claim by the crown prince that his standing shields him from U.S. courts.
Rights advocates had hoped up to the moment of filing that the administration would stay silent, offering no opinion on Prince Mohammedās immunity either way.
Sovereign immunity, a concept rooted in international law, holds that states and their officials are protected from some legal proceedings in other foreign statesā courts.
Prior criminal and civil cases brought against foreign governments and leaders in which the U.S. has not intervened have generally involved countries with which the U.S. has no diplomatic relations or does not recognize their heads of state or government as legitimate.
Cases brought against Iran and North Korea seeking damages for deaths or injuries to American citizens are two prominent examples of instances where the executive branch has not weighed in with an opinion about sovereign immunity.
By contrast, the United States has full diplomatic relations with Saudi Arabia. The State Department stressed Thursday that honoring the principle for other governmentsā leaders helps ensure that courts in other countries donāt seek to haul U.S. presidents before them to answer to lawsuits there.
Kirby, the National Security Council spokesman, said the U.S. decision had āabsolutely nothingā to do with ātenseā U.S.-Saudi relations over Saudi-led oil production cuts, and other matters.
Biden has been āvery, very vocalā about the ābrutal, barbaric murder of Khashoggi,ā Kirby said.
But some of Bidenās fellow Democrats in Congress expressed disappointment at the administrationās move.
āIs the Administration casting aside its confidence in its own intelligence communityās judgment?ā Sen. Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat, said in a statement. āIf the friends and family of Khashoggi are denied a path to accountability in the American court system, where in the world can they go?ā
Whitson, the official for Khashoggiās rights group, said the lawsuit would continue against the others named in the lawsuit.
__
Associated Press writer Aamer Madhani contributed to this report.
