New Delhiās foreign policy wonāt be insulated from its domestic politics, which demonise Indiaās 200 million Muslims
When the US state department recently told a court that the Saudi Arabian crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, should have immunity in a lawsuit over the murder of the journalist Jamal Khashoggi, it portrayed its argument as a legal and not moral position. By way of evidence, it pointed to a roguesā gallery of foreign leaders previously afforded similar protection. Nestling between Zimbabweās Robert Mugabe, who, it was claimed, assassinated political rivals, and Congoās Joseph Kabila, whose security detail was accused of assaulting protesters in Washington, was Indiaās Narendra Modi.
Dropping Mr Modi into such a list was no accident. It is a reminder that while New Delhi basks in its diplomatic success at recent G20 and Cop27 summits, it might find the international environment less accommodating if Mr Modi and his Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata party (BJP) continue to stir up hatred to win elections. Washingtonās gesture suggests that its strategic partnership with India cannot be completely insulated from domestic political issues. Mr Modiās failure, as chief minister of Gujarat, to prevent anti-Muslim riots in 2002 that left hundreds dead saw him denied a US visa, until he became Indian prime minister. The message from Foggy Bottom was that the ban had not been withdrawn, but suspended, because Mr Modi ran a country that Washington wanted to do business with.