Microsoft is headed for a battle with the Federal Trade Commission over whether the U.S. will block the tech giantās planned takeover of video game company Activision Blizzard.
Microsoft on Thursday filed a formal challenge to the FTC lawsuitās declaring the $68.7 billion deal an illegal acquisition that should be stopped.
After years of avoiding the political backlash that has been directed at big tech peers such as Amazon and Google, the software giant now appears to be on a collision course with U.S. regulators emboldened by President Joe Bidenās push to get tough on anti-competitive behavior.
The FTC claims the merger could violate antitrust laws by suppressing competitors to Microsoftās Xbox game console and its growing Xbox Game Pass subscription business.
At the center of the dispute is Microsoftās rivalry with PlayStation-maker Sony to secure popular Activision Blizzard franchises like the military shooter game Call of Duty.
The dispute could be a difficult test case for Biden-appointed FTC Chair Lina Khan, who has sought to strengthen enforcement of antitrust rules. The FTC voted 3-1 earlier in December to issue the complaint seeking to block the deal, with Khan and the two other Democratic commissioners voting in favor and the sole Republican voting against.
The deal is also under close scrutiny in the European Union and the United Kingdom, where investigations arenāt due to be completed until next year.
The FTCās complaint points to Microsoftās 2021 acquisition of well-known game developer Bethesda Softworks and its parent company ZeniMax, as an example of where Microsoft is making some upcoming game titles exclusive to Xbox despite assuring European regulators it had no intention to do so.
The FTCās suit describes top-selling franchises like Call of Duty as important because they develop a base of loyal users attached to their preferred console or streaming service.
āWith control of Activisionās content, Microsoft would have the ability and increased incentive to withhold or degrade Activisionās content in ways that substantially lessen competition ā including competition on product quality, price, and innovation,ā the FTC lawsuit says. āThis loss of competition would likely result in significant harm to consumers in multiple markets at a pivotal time for the industry.ā
Microsoft signaled that it will vigorously fight the case in court with a team led by high-profile corporate attorney Beth Wilkinson, while also leaving open the possibility of a settlement.
āEven with confidence in our case, we remain committed to creative solutions with regulators that will protect competition, consumers, and workers in the tech sector,ā said Microsoftās president, Brad Smith, in a statement Thursday. āAs weāve learned from our lawsuits in the past, the door never closes on the opportunity to find an agreement that can benefit everyone.ā
Microsoftās last big antitrust battle occurred more than two decades ago when a federal judge ordered its breakup following the companyās anticompetitive actions related to its dominant Windows software. That verdict was overturned on appeal, although the court imposed other penalties on the company.
The FTCās decision to send the complaint to its in-house Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell instead of seeking an urgent federal court injunction to halt the merger could drag the case out at least until August, when the first evidence hearing is scheduled. Microsoftās agreement with Activision Blizzard requires it to pay the video game company a breakup fee of up to $3 billion if it canāt close the deal before July 18.
The timing and trajectory of the case could change depending on how regulators in the U.K. and Europe rule on the merger next year. If Microsoft wins approval in Europe, it could use that to try to expedite the process in U.S. courts.
The merger faced yet another challenge this week from a group of individual video game players who sued in a San Francisco federal court to stop the deal on antitrust grounds.
The plaintiffs, all fans of Activision Blizzardās Call of Duty franchise and other popular titles such as World of Warcraft, Overwatch and Diablo, are particularly concerned about how the consolidation would affect future game quality, innovation and output, said their attorney Joseph Alioto.
āWhen thereās a lack of competition, the quality necessarily goes down,ā Alioto said. āBy eliminating Activision, it gives such a strong position to Microsoft that they can do whatever they want.ā
