Jonathan S. Tobin
(JNS) There was a certain irony to the telephone conversation that took place on Saturday between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and newly instated Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The latter phoned to ask that Ukraine oppose a United Nations resolution calling for the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to issue a legal opinion on the Israeli presence in Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem.
Yet they have the audacity to vote against Israel, at the UN again, and again. @IronTribeNation #Ukraineļø #Zielinski #Kyiv #Russia https://t.co/QHsdxTBdJk
ā The Jewish Voice (@JewishVoice) January 2, 2023
The phrase āquid pro quoāāLatin for an exchange of a favor in return for something elseāwas a central element of the first impeachment trial of former President Donald Trump. He was accused of inappropriately pressuring Zelenskyy to investigate corrupt activity in Ukraine by President Joe Bidenās son, Hunter, with the threat of withholding aid.
But it turns out that Zelenskyy knows how to play the same game himself when it comes to leaning on Israel.
The U.N. General Assembly resolution was yet another attempt by the Palestinians to wage ālawfareā against Israel. Like the U.N. Human Rights Councilās Commission of Inquiry report on the same subject, this was a thinly disguised antisemitic attack on the rights of Jews to live in their homeland.
Ā
And though Zelenskyyās argument on behalf of support against Russiaās illegal and brutal invasion of Ukraine is that his country is a bulwark of Western values and democracy, Kyiv voted in November with the antisemitic majority at the international body on the issue of issue of bringing the ICJ into the dispute over the territories.
Hypocrisy = Ukraine. Shame on Ukraine for Seeking to Have Russia Expelled from the UN when Ukraine Votes Against Israel All the Time #VolodymyrZelenskyy @Ukraine #Russia @UN #VladimirPutin @IsraelNewsNow @netanyahu https://t.co/6jpECVHVDE
ā The Jewish Voice (@JewishVoice) January 2, 2023
Blaming the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry for the above, Zelenskyy apologists at home and abroad claimed that he was not at fault. Yet, when Netanyahu asked him to do the right thing and join the United States and other Western nations in opposing this Palestinian provocation, Zelenskyy decided to play hardball.
As a āUkrainian officialā told Axios, āZelensky[y] said that in exchange for voting against the resolution or abstaining, he wanted to hear how the new Israeli government would change its policy and provide Ukraine with defense systems.ā
Perhaps, Zelenskyy thought the U.N. vote gave him the leverage he needed to get Netanyahu to give him a different answer than the one that heād received from former Israeli premiers Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid. But, though Netanyahu is wary of getting into a spat with a man who has become a global icon, he still said ānoāāalbeit with the qualification that heād be willing to discuss the question again sometime in the future.
Zelenskyy had a triumphal visit to Washington last month, with Congress cheering the āG.I. Joeā-costumed Ukrainian as if his presence was the second coming of Winston Churchill. And with Americaās forking over a staggering total of more than $100 billion in aid, TIME magazineās āperson of the yearā has grown accustomed to getting his way.
According to Axiosās source, āZelensky didnāt like [Netanyahuās] answer and didnāt agree to vote against the resolution or abstain. Instead, he instructed Ukraineās ambassador to the U.N. to not attend the vote.ā
Zelenskyy has been demanding that Israel share with him some of its most advanced defense systems, such as the Iron Dome, which Ukraine genuinely needs. Though the battle appears to have come to a bloody stalemateāwith Kyivās independence now largely assuredāMoscow is continuing to fire missiles that have been causing extensive property damage and casualties.
Ukraine is definitely the aggrieved party in this war, and sympathy for its cause is justified. But the notion that Israel ought to strip its own defenses and arms supplies in order to help Kyiv keep fighting is absurd.
Leaving aside the Jerusalemās justified hesitation to join in a conflict against a Russian regime that has effective control of much of neighboring Syriaāand that holds its Jewish population as virtual hostagesāthere are sound military reasons for Israel to deny Zelenskyyās request. The Jewish state barely has enough Iron Dome batteries and other sophisticated systems to defend against the ongoing threats from Gaza-based Hamas terrorists along its southern border and against Lebanonās Hezbollah in the north.
Zelenskyy has every right to act in the best interests of his country, but for him to ask Israel to leave itself open to possible attack from two fronts for the sake of Ukraine is neither reasonable nor fair.
Nor should he be given a pass for his willingness to use a U.N. vote against Israel as blackmail. Those who were ready to pillory Trump for his version of a quid pro quo with Ukraine should be the first to agree.
Ukraineās victimization at the hands of war-crime-committing Russia goes a long way toward explaining the worldās willingness to excuse just about anything Zelenskyy has done in the past year. Still, though he poses as the avatar of 21st-century democracy, his government is anything but. And despite Zelenskyyās Jewish origins, he is not a friend of Israel or the Jewish people.
The corrupt nature of the powers-that-be in Kyivāas well as the presidentās efforts to ban opponents, silence press critics and even shutter certain churchesāhave been known for months. The New York Times finally got around to reporting about a new law Zelenskyyās implementing to codify his ability to censor political foes.
Kyiv also continues to deny the close historic association between Ukrainian nationalism and antisemitism. Indeed, Zelenskyy used a virtual speech to the Knesset last spring to engage in what can only be described as Holocaust denialāfalsely claiming that Ukrainians acted in solidarity with Jewish victims, rather than being active Nazi collaborators. This week, the Ukrainian parliament issued a proclamation quoting Stepan Bandera, a Hitler-sympathizing pogromist who was responsible for the slaughter of both ethnic Poles and Jews during the Nazi occupation, someone who is still treated as a hero in Kyiv.
Itās not unreasonable to speculate that the inordinate pressure Zelenskyy has put on Israel to join the war against Russia, and unwillingness to vote with the U.S. and other Western nations against anti-Israel U.N. resolutions, stems from a desire to play to public opinion at home.
Regardless of his motives, however, or the desire of most people to help Ukrainians defend their independence against Russia, thereās no excuse for Zelenskyyās attempt to strongarm Netanyahu into weakening Israel. Unlike what was said about its Foreign Ministry behavior in November, Ukraineās current reluctance to side with Israel at the U.N. is clearly a deliberate decision, not a bureaucratic snafu.
All of the above ought to serve as a wakeup call for those inclined to excuse Ukraine for anything it does due to Russian aggression. They need to understand that itās possible to support self-determination for Ukraine, and admire its fight for survival, while viewing the adulation for Zelensky as divorced from the reality of his rule.
They should realize, as well, that itās equally possible to oppose Russia without pretending that Zelenskyy is something that he isnāt, or that calls for an end to the fightingārather than a Ukrainian policy of pursuing an unlikely complete victory over Moscowāare Russian propaganda.
Finally, as long as Zelenskyy continues to bully Israel and flirt with antisemitic moves against it, those who care about the Jewish state would do well to stop portraying him as a Jewish heroāor any kind of hero at all.
Jonathan S. Tobin is editor-in-chief of JNS (Jewish News Syndicate). Follow him on Twitter at: @jonathans_tobin.
The post Should Zelenskyy get away with using a UN vote to blackmail Israel? appeared first on The Jewish Voice.
