
Fresco of the Holy Prophet JonahĀ | GS
Jonah and the WhaleĀ |Ā Investigative Hermeneutics – Google Search
M.N.:Ā The Reluctant Prophet Jonah as one of the early Hermeneutic Interpreters: Searching for the understanding and interpretation is being inside of the whale. Finding it is getting out of the whale. If the Higher Authorities want you to interpret and to prophesy, you cannot escape, not even in the belly of a whale.Ā
Mike Novaās Shared NewsLinksĀ
| Mike Nova’s Shared NewsLinks |
||
|---|---|---|
| Jonah – Wikipedia | ||
JonahĀ orĀ Jonas[a]Ā is the name given in theĀ Hebrew BibleĀ (Tanakh/Old Testament) to aĀ prophetĀ of the northernĀ kingdom of IsraelĀ in about the 8th centuryĀ BCE. He is the eponymous central figure of theĀ Book of Jonah, in which he is called upon byĀ GodĀ to travel toĀ NinevehĀ and warn its residents to repent of theirĀ sinsĀ or faceĀ divine wrath. Instead, Jonah boards a ship toĀ Tarshish. Caught in a storm, he orders the ship’s crew to cast him overboard, whereupon he is swallowed by a giant fish. Three days later, after Jonah agrees to go to Nineveh, the fish vomits him out onto the shore. Jonah successfully convinces the entire city of Nineveh to repent, but waits outside the city in expectation of its destruction. God shields Jonah from the sun with aĀ plant, but later sends a worm to cause it to wither. When Jonah complains of the bitter heat, God rebukes him.
InĀ Judaism, the story of Jonah represents the teaching ofĀ teshuva, which is the ability to repent and be forgiven byĀ God. In theĀ New Testament,Ā JesusĀ calls himself “greater than Jonah” and promises theĀ PhariseesĀ “the sign of Jonah”, which isĀ his resurrection. EarlyĀ ChristianĀ interpreters viewed Jonah as aĀ typeĀ for Jesus. Later, during theĀ Reformation, Jonah came to be seen instead as anĀ archetypeĀ for the “envious Jew”. Jonah is regarded as a prophet inĀ IslamĀ and theĀ biblicalĀ narrative of Jonah is repeated, with a few notable differences, in theĀ Quran. MainstreamĀ Bible scholarsĀ generally regard the Book of Jonah asĀ fictionalĀ and often at least partiallyĀ satirical, but the character of Jonah may have been based on the historical prophet of the same name mentioned inĀ 2 Kings 14:25. Although the word “whale” is often used in English versions of the Jonah story, the Hebrew text actually uses the phraseĀ dag gadol, which means “giant fish”. In the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, the species of the fish that swallowed Jonah was the subject of speculation forĀ naturalists, who interpreted the story as an account of a historical incident. Some modern scholars of folklore have noted similarities between Jonah and other legendary figures, such asĀ GilgameshĀ and the Greek heroĀ Jason. |
||
| jonah whale – Google Search | ||
|
||
| jonah – Google Search | ||
|
||
| jonah – Google Search | ||
|
||
| book of jonah – Google Search | ||
|
||
| book of jonah – Google Search | ||
|
||
| book of jonah – Google Search | ||
|
||
| book of jonah – Google Search | ||
|
||
| jonah and the whale – Google Search | ||
|
||
| jonah and the whale – Google Search | ||
|
||
| jonah and the whale – Google Search | ||
|
||
| jonah and the whale – Google Search | ||
|
||
| jonah and the whale – Google Search | ||
|
||
| jonah and the whale – Google Search | ||
|
||
| jonah and the whale – Google Search | ||
|
||
| jonah and the whale – Google Search | ||
|
||
| jonah and the whale – Google Search | ||
|
||
| Investigative Hermeneutics – Google Search | ||
|
||
| August 14, 2018 | ||
A look at the best news photos from around the world. |
||
| bridges collapse – Google Search | ||
|
||
| Buck Sexton: Another one bites the dust at the FBI | ||
Buck Sexton: Another one bites the dust at the FBI
What Fusion GPS told DOJ about Trump
01:54
Next Up: What Fusion GPS told DOJ about Trump
Live
01:54
What Fusion GPS told DOJ about Trump
01:13
Jamal Simmons: Some black politicians worry Southern GOP is trying to wipe out white Democrats through redistricting
00:11
Carl Cannon: Most political analysts let their dislike of Trump blind them from the possibility he could win
02:29
Buck Wild: If ex-intel officials want to act like partisans, they shouldn’t be surprised that Trump treats them like partisans
00:50
The Hillās Jonathan Turley: Dems from swing states face even more pressure to support SCOTUS nomination
01:21
Elaine Plott: moderates sparked movement behind GOP immigration bills
00:32
Jamal Simmons: ‘Stand your ground’ cases feel like ‘a one-man lynch mob’
01:34
Krystal Ball responds to Charlie Kirk: ‘It’s a bit much’ to tie Antifa to Dems
Signed in asĀ mikenova
Share this story on NewsBlur |
||
| TCHAIKOVSKY – Symphony no6 (Pathetique) – Herbert von Karajan & Wiener Phil – YouTube | ||
TCHAIKOVSKY – Symphony no6 (Pathetique) – Herbert von Karajan & Wiener Phil |
||
| Karajan Plays Mozart – YouTube | ||
Karajan Plays Mozart |
||
| Manafort Lawyers Rest Without Calling Witnesses in Fraud Trial | ||
ALEXANDRIA, Va. ā Lawyers for Paul Manafort rested without calling witnesses on Tuesday in their clientās trial on bank and fraud charges, a stark contrast from the prosecutionās case that included testimony from nearly two dozen people and hundreds of documents entered into evidence.
Before they rested, the judge, T.S. Ellis III, denied a motion to acquit Mr. Manafort. Judge Ellis scheduled closing arguments to begin on Wednesday morning. Prosecutors for the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, had rested on Monday after mounting what appeared to be a powerful case that Mr. Manafort, President Trumpās former campaign chairman, had evaded taxes on roughly $16.5 million in income and fraudulently obtained more than $21 million in bank loans. The core of the governmentās case rested on more than two days of testimony by Rick Gates, Mr. Manafortās onetime trusted aide, who has pleaded guilty to two felony charges and is hoping his cooperation will keep him out of prison. Mr. Gates recounted helping Mr. Manafort hide his income in foreign bank accounts and trick banks into extending him loans that he was not qualified to receive.
Mr. Manafortās lawyers had assailed Mr. Gates as a liar, adulterer and thief who had committed all of the crimes that Mr. Manafort was accused of, and more. On the stand, Mr. Gates admitted to a host of offenses, including stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars from Mr. Manafortās bank accounts and concealing $3 million of his own income from tax authorities. While he appeared confident when prosecutors questioned him about Mr. Manafortās criminal activity, he grew less sure when defense lawyers confronted him with questions about his own misdeeds.
Asked about how he embezzled funds by filing false expense reports, for example, Mr. Gates replied at one point: āIt wasnāt a scheme. I just added numbers to the reports.ā The trial, the first for Mr. Muellerās office, did not relate to the Trump campaign or Russiaās campaign of interference in 2016 presidential election, but Judge Ellis had ruled that Mr. Muellerās mandate was broad enough for him to pursue the case. While it was not a focus, references to the Trump campaign emerged intermittently during the trial. Mr. Gates testified that Mr. Manafortās political consulting firm, for which he worked for years, had no clients or income at the time the Trump campaign hired the two men in March 2016. Mr. Manafort managed delegates to the national convention, rose to campaign chairman in two months, then was forced out in late August amid allegations that he had failed to report his work for oligarchs in Ukraine who were allied with Russia. Mr. Gates, who stayed with the campaign through the election, testified that āit was possibleā that he stole money then from the Trump inaugural committee while serving as its executive director.
Defense attorneys attempted to question him about the special counselās interest in the campaign, perhaps in the hopes that jurors would see the Manafort prosecution as part of a politically inspired effort to gather evidence against the president. Mr. Trump routinely condemns Mr. Muellerās investigation as a āwitch hunt.ā
But they dropped that line of questioning after the prosecutors objected and the judge apparently ruled it was out of bounds. He sealed the transcript of the discussion of the issue at the bench after prosecutors argued that they needed to protect an ongoing investigation. The defenseās decision to rest without presenting its own case is relatively common, experts said, given that the burden of proof is on the prosecution. āThe defense believes it has made its point through cross-examination that the governmentās proof is not judicial,ā said Nancy Gertner, a Harvard Law School professor and a former federal judge. āTheyāre relying on the jury to agree with them.ā
Emily Baumgaertner and Emily Cochrane contributed reporting.
|
||
| Trump unloads on FBI, Robert Mueller, Jeff Sessions, Peter Strzok | ||
Signed in asĀ mikenova
Share this story on NewsBlur |
















